|
|
US Military-Intelligence Double
Agent
Plans, Trains, and Assists in
Terrorism?
If so, it appears the US military
intelligence community is guilty of continually aiding and abetting
terrorists in support of an
Operation Northwoods scenario aimed at sponsoring a series of Middle East
wars for control of the region's
oil
Note: This is a lengthy article, but it is so much like a spy novel
in its twists and intrugue that you should likely
enjoy taking your time with it -- and it is far too important to ignore.
Return to Noilwar! Main
Page
| 14 Mysteries
reveal more than 30 Indicators
Ali Mohamed is an American Double Agent, and more: Am I a traitor for seeking to reveal US intelligence operations? Fomenting terrorism via agent provocateurs is an old game What is the nature and role of a double agent? Media jigsaw puzzle - why does no one source tell the full story? Meet America's terrorist double agent, Ali Mohamed: 1952-1981 time frame How to create a double agent - Ali Mohamed: 1981-1985 Super weapon for agents: Political Control Technology Insertion of a double agent in-country - Ali Mohamed: 1985 The mystery of the US Military and Ali Mohamed: 1986-1989 The mystery of the World Trade Center terrorists and Ali Mohamed: 1988-1989 The mystery of the defense contractor and Ali Mohamed: 1989 A murder mystery and Ali Mohamed: 1990 The mystery of al Qaeda power and Ali Mohamed: 1990-1993 The mystery of the WTC bombing and Ali Mohamed: 1993 The mystery of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police and Ali Mohamed: 1993 The mystery of a little white lie under oath and Ali Mohamed: 1993 vs. 2000 The mystery of Osama bin Laden's failed assassination and Ali Mohamed: 1994 The mystery of ignored evidence and Ali Mohamed: 1994 The magical mystery tour of al-Zawahiri and Ali Mohamed: 1995 The mystery of double agent CS-1 and Ali Mohamed: 1998-2000 The mystery of the crash of Egyptair Flight 990 and Ali Mohamed: 1999 The mystery of if Ali Mohamed is a double agent working for our side, or theirs My voice is not alone. Key insiders, and others agree Ali Mohamed is a double agent |
Major Ali Mohamed, Egyptian Army Intelligence,
Ft. Bragg JFK Special Warfare Center
Operation Bright Star (USAF photo) |
|
US Military-Intelligence Double Agent Plans, Trains, and Assists in Terrorism? If so, it appears the US military intelligence community
is guilty of continually aiding and abetting
Copyright © 2003 H. Michael Sweeney, Noilwar! All commercial
rights reserved
Am I a traitor for seeking to reveal US intelligence operations? There is growing evidence the question above and its subtitle are true - instance after instance demonstrate a pattern of horrific and murderous deceit. A series of mysteries found in the life of Ali Mohamed reveal thirty separate indicators of his simultaneous relationships with terrorists and the US military-intelligence community. This article examines the question of if one Ali Mohamed was an operating double agent asset working for the US military-intelligence community in the time frame leading up to the 911 attacks. If true, I am exposing US intelligence secrets, an act contrary to declared 'national security' interests. One must ask why I risk harsh reprisals by so doing. Am I a traitor, or am I exposing traitors within these agencies? The reason the matter is critical and must be explored and exposed is this: If Ali is such an agent, then as seen in review of his role in the US military intelligence community, the US government is actually helping and freely allowing Osama bin Laden to carry out terrorism against the United States, perhaps even planning and fomenting it. This in turn means the sacrifice of significant numbers of American lives may have been sanctioned by the government in order to protect and promote Ali as double agent. This would seem to include 911 and the thousands of innocent civilian lives lost that terrible day, and prior acts which took many hundreds more to their graves, and injured more than 5,000. Fomenting terrorism via agent provocateurs is an old game History is rife with examples of governments committing acts of terrorism upon its own citizens for political gain. The most oft cited example is Hitler's Reichstag fire, which destroyed the beloved German National Library. Hitler blamed the fire on the communists, and through slick propaganda, leveraged this one relatively minor event into full control of the German government and the Nazi party, repressive laws, siezure of the free press, destruction of the free labor movement, and the creation of whole new security agencies to 'protect the homeland.' Given his family's fascist leanings and historical ties to the Nazis in WWII, many people fear this is exactly what the Bush oil dynasty is doing here in America, step for step -- and they are not finished, yet. The strongest proof is found in Ali Mohamed and the existence of Operation Northwoods. Ali, it seems, is seen to have been a key participant in various acts of deadly terrorism and just as key in planning many of them. We find him involved in Embassy bombings as well as both the WTC bombing attack and the plot to crash multiple airliners into buildings which led to 911. If this was done with CIA and military intelligence blessings, and no actions were taken to prevent such attacks, the US cannot claim no foreknowledge of such attacks, and is itself guilty of terrorism against you and me. It would further mean that an orchestrated Nazi like propaganda effort was being directed through media by government in what amounts to CIA style psychological warfare; a kind of mind control through disinformation and lies. The only logical answer would seem to be a Reichstags fire scenario; a government fomenting violence against their own people for political gain - and profits. The payoff is increased political control at home through draconian responses to terrorism, and the creation of whole new repressive agencies such as Homeland Security and the Total Information Awareness Office. There is the additional control of oil resources abroad through puppet regimes established in the wake of wars against Islamic nations set up as 'sponsors' of the terrorism. And of course, there are other ways to make money in a war. The Bush family did that in WWII with American and German business partners, and were, along with cronies, even punished under the Trading with The Enemy Act (19) by Congress. They and their American and Islamic partners are well positioned to do it again, today. As time goes by we learn of more and more details which imply the terrorists of 911 had direct ties to, were trained by, housed by, or employed by the military, military contractors, CIA, and even a company headed by George Bush at the time. We even learned that an Israeli spy ring investigating the terrorists was simultaneously investigating relationships with their US contacts in the military and intelligence communities (19.) The US simply threw the Israeli spies out of the country rather than investigate their actions or file charges, charges which would have resulted in court room descriptions of the terrorists cozy relationships to America's intelligence superstructure. It should be no wonder, then, that the Israelis warned select Israeli individuals of the 911 attack (19) just hours before the attack. But Ali is the best single example and perhaps the only example of such things for which we have detailed access to information. He appears to be an actual double agent, which makes him a critical link and point of evidence of US complicity. This brings us to Northwoods, which is the original blueprint for an American Reichstag. Operation Northwoods was a Department of Defense plan signed off on by all five Joint Chiefs of Staff calling for staged terrorism against US military and civilian targets in the United States in order to generate support for a war. The game is an old one: blow up your own ships, bomb your own buildings, kill your own citizens, and blame an enemy. Hitler was expert at it. It seems that American fascists are no different than Nazi fascists. Amerika, like Germany, under the guise of such terrorism, is waxing very much towards becoming a fascist military-police state. We even give it a Germanic descriptive 'Homeland' security. Sich heil! Sich Heil! Sich Heil! What is the nature and role of a double agent? A double agent is a spy who works for you, but who is also recruited to be a spy for the other side. Usually, only one side knows the spying is in two directions, the side which has the spy's true loyalty. Of course, a double agent can be rogue, working both sides against the middle for self promotion, or actually be working for the other side all along, or even for a third country - a triple agent. And, it is even possible that both sides are aware of any such reality and simply using the spy as bait and to provide disinformation. A double agent plays the most dangerous of games, running the risk that either side will suddenly distrust him and end his game - permanently, or sacrifice him for some strategic gain. But a good double agent offers the best chance to get access to the enemy's innermost secrets, or at the very least, to learn their methods and resources applied in spying and plotting against your side. Thus they are a valuable commodity, one typically left in place until they learn something that warrants taking action (i.e., to prevent an enemy action or breach of security caused by it.) Such moves usually require that the agent be sacrificed or pulled back to be protected from reprisals, as acting on such information frequently gives away the double agent's part in the matter. Being a double agent often requires that the agent prove himself worthy of trust by the other side. He may be called upon to provide information about your side or to undertake missions to gather intelligence on your side, assassinate your people, reveal your active agents, or attack your assets. Often, a double agent is allowed to do such harm in hopes that the trust gained will allow even greater harm to the enemy at some point. The question is, who determines if and when should such lines be crossed and when they should be drawn firm and inviolate? Someone must judge the risk and cost versus the intended and actual gains. As we will see in the case of Ali Mohamed, there seems to be no limit to the latitude allowed. Thousands of American lives and billions of dollars in assets were sacrificed. And to what gain? A double agent has a goal -- to gather information which damages the other side, and often, to effect that damage directly (assassinate, bomb, etc.) This double agent resulted in no information whatsoever being acted upon by our government. No terrorist act of any kind was defeated or stopped. Multiple opportunities to get bin Laden and even a chance to get all the top terrorists of the world in a single strike were passed up. However, Ali was pulled - just prior to the attacks of 911, which implies that perhaps that event was the big payoff for his efforts. Yet 911 itself was even allowed to transpire. We must ask, if these were not the goals of inserting a double agent, then what were? What did we buy with nearly 5,000 lives? There is another possibility. Sometimes double agents are actually agent
provocateurs designed to stir political upheaval deemed beneficial to your
side. Perhaps, rather than defeating the terrorist's efforts, it was to
augment and direct them to their inevitable ends, in order that a Northwoods
operation might better succeed. I make that charge, here, and back it up
with facts to make the point clear: the United States government is guilty
of terrorism against its own people, as well as a form of genocide against
a whole religion/race set up as scapegoats, both crimes aimed at stealing
their oil, and a means of gaining tighter political control at home.
|
  |
This article was not easy to research and organize
for presentation. For some reason, the American media, owned principally
by MIIM* military defense contractors
and/or infiltrated by thousands of CIA Project
Mockingbird operatives, consistently fails to mention the most blockbuster
facts which would make any news consumer want to know more, and start to
demand answers. Instead, they reprint (often word for word) the same dry
minimalist facts as offered them by government press statements, leaving
anyone seeking the truth to look elsewhere. Not one includes all the important
facts, though some might drop a tidbit not offered elsewhere. Indeed, one
must go to the foreign press to get at the meat of things. Also odd...
the foreign press frequently mentions US press statements, but the US press
seldom quotes from the foreign press.
* MIIM: a term I coined in my (unpublished) 1992 work, Fatal Rebirth - the Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media complex, an enhanced and updated reference to the collective President Eisenhower described in his farewell address as simply the military industrial complex. He warned in his speech that such an entity was growing in this country and was a threat to its continued existence as a free society. As a result, I had to scour through endless news sources to glean various select details not mentioned by others. Such study also revealed an interesting pattern of seemingly coordinated deceptions regarding Ali, a kind of shift in emphasis in media regarding the man and his actions once things reached a certain point. While there were commonly outright omissions of more dramatic and newsworthy story elements by virtually every US news source, the slanting of stories and the inclusion of outright misleading statements and |
| government propaganda (how significant and large scale FBI counterintelligence
efforts were, for example, as illustrated by The
Washington File) was not uncommon. The greatest hat trick is when Ali
went from being described as a US mole in the terrorist camp to being a
terrorist mole in the US - almost overnight. This attempt to distance US
complicity in his actions is somewhat transparent when seeing what foreign
press writes about him -- and the actions of both Ali and government regarding
each other in the final months of his career. As is often the case, only
the foreign press dares tell the whole story and ask key questions you
and I should be shouting at the White House. Our Jennings and our Brokow
serve us not. Diogenese thwarted, again.
The picture created by these various puzzle pieces would be something entirely different than the US government, through a MIIM controlled media, has represented. A list of references will be provided at the end of document. This article attempts to sequence these facts and note their relevance to the double agent and Northwoods scenario. The reader is encouraged to read with a critical eye, check my references, draw their own conclusions and, if finding a strong likelihood that Ali was a double agent for the US, to spread the word: America is under attack from its own government - a new kind of terrorism called Domestic State Sponsored Terrorism (a nation terrorizing its own people to gain tighter political control) on behalf of corporate profits and an emerging police state, and global rule. Welcome to the New World Order. Meet America's terrorist double agent, Ali Mohamed: 1952-1981 time frame |
|
If CIA had inserted a double agent into Al Qaeda, the ideal candidate would fit a rather specific profile. Most such agents come from a pool of qualifiers which have a somewhat generic list of ideal credentials, experience, background, and circumstance. But to infiltrate an Islamic terrorist group would require some additional special characteristics. Ali Mohamed fits all requirements. This section examines how perfect a fit he is, shows how he could have been recruited and managed as a US asset while still operating as a trusted asset to Osama bin Laden and other terrorists, and at the same time, reveals how and why any such reality makes the US military-intelligence community culpable for 911 in an Operation Northwoods style plot. In review of the whole of his story, no fact or evidence would seem to contradict, and all elements would seem to support such a notion... |
 |
To create a double agent requires that you first create an agent with field experience as a covert operative. Ali became that with the Egyptian military, where his primary duties would naturally have involved investigation of domestic Islamic fundamentalist movements which were terrorist in nature. In fact, he was assigned to recruit informants (5,) a task which is exactly the type of covert field operations only a full-fledged spy would undertake. Egypt, like many of the Islamic nations in the region, was struggling to avoid revolutionary forces based on religious fundamentalism tearing the country asunder. This was extremely sensitive and dangerous work which required the svelte hand of a pro who had top notch training and support. The next key step in creating a double agent is to get them into the other side as a trusted friend. |
| A natural means for doing this was to have Ali investigate the terrorist
groups and uncover some deep, dark secret that would damage the group.
Rather than using that to make arrests and foil plans of the terrorists,
it would be a simple matter to make known that the knowledge had been acquired
but to also remain quiet about it, and to let the plans unfold, perhaps
even providing key information or helps to insure success of the plan.
By playing turncoat, the other side believes they have found a new ally.
Complete trust not obtained, and is not the issue, but establishing a minimal
working relationship, is. This would be an easy matter for a well placed
and guided agent assigned to so infiltrate. The question is, are there
indicators Ali took such steps?
Such an opportunity may have arose in 1981 when Egyptian President Anwar Sadat was assassinated by the very group that Ali was known to have been spying upon, the Egyptian Islamic Jihad (3.) That Ali may have actually used this murder to cement his relationship with the terrorists is indicated by a 1988 conversation with a US Military officer, Lt. Col. Robert Anderson, in which Ali stated "Anwar Sadat was a traitor, and he had to die." (4) As we will later see, Anderson's relationship with Mohamed was itself rather interesting. This is our first indicator that Ali had been established as a double agent, if not for and by the US, then for the Egyptians, an asset perhaps to be passed on to the US, later. As such, it is a weak indicator, pending confirmations, which do exist. The next step in establishing a double agent is to make the agent seem very valuable to the other side, to establish that element of trust. This is achieved by giving them actual access to broad categories of classified materials the other side would find of interest - to tempt them and to allow the agent to provide useful but not critical intelligence for the purpose. This was likely achieved when Ali was introduced into key circles of the US military intelligence network. This would likely have taken place during Operation Bright Star shortly after the assassination (1.) Bright Star is an annual joint Egyptian-US desert war games which is one of the largest such operations in the world. Again, there will be more on this, later. While it is not a documented event, other clues over time will suggest it played such a role -- and it is exactly the kind of opportunity which would excite a terrorist group. It is likely true, in that such a war game would naturally involve both Egyptian and American intelligence officers. This may thus be the first time Ali had an opportunity to catch the eye of future US handlers. Indeed. This opportunity, our second tentative indicator, would seem to have been leveraged into Ali's being sent to the US for special military-intelligence training under a cooperative agreement between the two nations. Ali attended the John F. Kennedy School of Modern Warfare at Ft. Bragg, where he attended courses along side of Green Berets and Delta forces in surveillance, explosives, command and control, counterinsurgency and unconventional warfare (1.) While there, it is known that he had obtained Bright Star documents either from Egypt or while at Ft. Bragg -- they turn up later in this presentation. Given that access, and the fact that Bright Star comes up repeatedly in Ali's history, the value of the first two indicators is verified. Ali then returned to Egypt and, a short time later, left the Egyptian military in 1984 (3.) The next step in creating a double agent is to establish a useful means of constant communications between agent and handlers which will pass scrutiny. To do this, you generally wish the opponents to think they are the ones obtaining a double agent, which will justify constant contact between both sides without raising suspicions of the other side. Ali achieved this soon after leaving the Egyptian military. He first became a security consultant to Egypt's airline, Egyptair, where he offered counter terrorism advice for eighteen months (3.) While in that position, he contacted the Central Intelligence Agency and offered his services as a double agent. Given that it is likely that Ali had already been in contact with CIA all along, this would be seen as meeting this step's requirement - a third indicator. To his Islamic friends, he is seen as trying to gain the trust of CIA. Egyptair, like Bright Star, will be revisited in this investigation. This must have been a fortunate arrangement for CIA, though they would later use plausible deniability tactics to refute the matter. Ali in this time frame came into contact with whole new terrorist groups, to include the German branch of Hezbollah, which will also be an important element, later. Ali told this group he was associated with CIA, which is something he would likely do if seeking to appear as a double agent on the enemy's behalf - it would otherwise get him killed to make such a statement (5.) Yet this fact was itself reported back to CIA (apparently by another mole within the group) which in turn tells us that the action was, in all likelihood, a planned step as part of working for CIA to infiltrate the group. These two interlocking and mutually supportive facts brings us up to five indicators. What happens next as a result of this event is very telling, but will be put off for the moment. |
 |
The topic of political control technology requires its own
article. It is not, as some would have you believe, a fanciful X-files
world of fictional construct. Indeed, I have written a book on topic, which
specifically includes mind control tactics and the use of other psychological
manipulations of targeted individuals. I will go so far as to say that
EVERY American has already been victimized by at least one form of mind
control -- that of a controlled media (disinformation), which causes our
choices to often be those desired for us by others, and not those of our
own volition. When this happens, our natural free will has been subverted.
As it happens, the story of 911 is very much under scrutiny as a psy-ops warfare enmeshed event, and on multiple levels using multiple techniques against multiple target individuals and groups. This is covered in some detail in my book, MC Realities. The great bulk of all research and application of such technology and methodology comes from CIA and the military. In my ProParanoid newsletter (e-zine,) I offer one whole issue which details over 250 real-world terms and devices, techniques, etc., based on these advances (free copy for the asking.) The topic is raised here because of troubling reports that Ali Mohamed, in addition to everything else, is a psychologist specifically trained in how to apply drugs, hypnosis, and other tools of psychology for political control of individuals and groups. This could extend to the ability to induce terrorists to kill themselves - as well as to help plan terrorist events which are capable of producing maximum short and long-term psychological damage with respect to the nature of the induced terror. If these reports are true, then Ali is a very special person, one who has been |
 |
Now we can look at what happened after Ali was reported telling Hezbollah he worked for CIA. CIA's response was immediate: they somewhat publicly 'terminated' their relationship with Ali. This is not something Agency would do even if thinking he was 'untrustworthy,' as they claimed was their reasoning. Agency would prefer to study the situation and find a way to take advantage -- if they were truly disenchanted. However, if they wanted the other side to think he really was a double agent, they might take such a step. For one thing, it would imply to the group that there was another mole in their organization, and likely, due to the nature of the information, allow them to pinpoint and eliminate him. Thus, Ali's termination was likely a sacrifice play resulting in the murder of the mole, to insure the new terrorist group trusted Ali, completely. All this may be deemed as mere conjecture, if the reader desires. But the next element will confirm it. Thus, this is the first indicator for this section that Ali is a double agent. |
 |
Yet such a move (public termination as CIA operative) would
require the establishment of a new communications mechanism, one replacing
CIA with some other tantalizing target for the double Agent role -- from
the terrorist's view. This was provided almost immediately. Ali marries
a US citizen in Santa Clara and then joins the US military in 1986 (6.)
In this event is further confirmation he is blessed by CIA, not condemned
by them, since he is given a Secret security clearance which means a complete
Federal
Beaureau of Investigation examination of his past, especially
given his status as a foreign citizen and military background, which in
turn means a check with CIA. This is doubly clear since he is still a foreign
national whose military records are known the US military and would telegraph
alarm bells to all concerned. Regardless, before long, his terrorist connections
would refer to him as 'Abu Mohamed al Amriki,'
which translates as 'Father Mohamed, the American.' This is the first
indicator for this section.
What is interesting about his enlistment are several key points. One is, that he is quite old to be enlisting (35 years.) The military seldom takes people at that age. I was turned down by both CIA and the Air Force reserves, and the Sinai Listening Post projects as being too old at 35 - despite a great military background, top secret clearance, and significant additional qualifications. Two, is he quickly rises in rank to Sergeant (7.) Three, is that he is assigned to the same unit he had earlier trained at in Ft. Bragg - an |
|
Towards the close of 1988, Ali began to make
many trips to the NY City area (New Jersey) on weekends where he regularly
met with and trained Islamic terrorists (1) connected with the assassination
of Anwar Sadat (7,) and who would later be involved in the WTC bombing.
Chief among these Islamics was one young student named el
Sayyid Nosair, who established such a close relationship with
Mohamed that his home became Ali's home (1) away from home (Ft. Bragg.)
Nosiar's story will seperately become a key to unlocking more secrets about
Ali.
Towards the close of 1988, Ali began to make many trips to the NY City area (New Jersey) on weekends where he regularly met with and trained Islamic terrorists (1) connected with the assassination of Anwar Sadat (7,) and who would later be involved in the WTC bombing. Chief among these Islamics was one young student named el Sayyid Nosair, who established such a close relationship with Mohamed that his home became Ali's home (1) away from home (Ft. Bragg.) Nosiar's story will seperately become a key to unlocking more secrets about Ali. And how did Mohamed meet Nosair? They met at the Islamic Al-Kitah Center which was associated with Afghan Refugee Services, Inc. (15.) These organizations were established to help the Mujahadine, sponsored and funded by CIA Operation Cydone and staffed by, among others, colleagues of Osama bin Laden (ibid.) Ali Mohamed simply went there and made friends, and the rest was history. How did he know where to go and who to meet? After all, CIA was fully aware of who each and every person involved in this matter was, and for the most part, had arranged for them to enter the country. This is how you insert a double agent and set up his organization - in this case, a terrorist cell. This is the first indicator. Personally, I find this all just a bit too convenient, given that the WTC bombing was essentially an agent provocateur operation of FBI and, likely, CIA. Some evidences of this will be found as the reader progresses, so I will not take up time and space here to explain in detail - it not even the topic of concern, here. But I make the claim based on FBI and CIA operative statements, media accounts, and court records. Ali fits perfectly into such a scenario, in that Ali trained the terrorists in explosives techniques, weapons handling, surveillance and other covert methodology (1.) Later, court arguments would be that the US Army had sent Ali to New Jersey specifically to conduct these trainings (1) which, if true, would indicate an Operations Northwoods scenario in play. This is a significant indicator. |
| But it seems clear his trips and the purpose were generally known by
others at Ft. Bragg, and many assumed his work there was on behalf of the
Army or of CIA. Evidence this is so would not be uncovered until some time
later, however, when a murder investigation would reveal just how extensive
the helps had been. In 1990, Nosair would be charged with the murder of
a Rabbi named Meier Kahane, an outspoken
Jewish leader in the New Jersey area (1) who founded the Jewish
Defense League.
But before this crime, Ali would be videotaped by FBI giving weapons training to five of the New Jersey terrorists, all of whom would eventually be convicted of the 1993 WTC bombing (9.) However, FBI does nothing in the way of questioning any of the terrorists or even of investigating Ali, a matter which his commanding officer would have likely been aware, if for no other reason than his earlier requests for investigation, which would make him a useful witness in any determinations. In fact, FBI would later claim their surveillance was presumed to represent zealot Islamics training for possible soldiering in Afghanistan against the Soviets. This is clearly a cover story which only makes sense if they already knew (likely through CIA) who and what Ali was; a double agent. FBI simply does not conduct surveillance unless intending to investigating those surveilled. I count this as a significant indicator. Shortly after this, Ali would leave the military in 1989 with an honorable discharge, complete with commendations (4) for "patriotism, valor, fidelity and professional excellence." Given his commanding officer's opinion and concerns about Ali, one can only wonder how the Army came to this conclusion, or why they did so. It would, of course, serve the needs of someone running a double agent, by giving that agent a better cover and better credibility. This, therefore, is another indicator. It should be noted that he continued to visit the New Jersey area and train Islamics (1) with classified materials, raising the possibility that separation from the Army was not total or perhaps even actual, but possibly, staged -- perhaps for plausible denial, if needed. Yet once more, as it was when CIA 'fired' Ali, he was now no longer blessed with access to the US military intelligence community. He would need to rectify that if he were to remain to be a valuable asset to the other side, and continue to be valuable to his CiA or military handlers. |
 |
After returning to Santa Clara, but while still traveling
to New Jersey to conduct training (7,) Mohamed applied for and apparently
obtained a position in the security field. Reports describe an application
for such a position with a major defense contractor located near his home
(6.) This author believes, if for no other reason than to stir the pot
of "what if", that this firm was the Raytheon
Corporation, which is has some very sensitive operations in
Santa Clara. Moreover, Raytheon is inextricably intertwined in the 911
attack in very mysterious ways which would seem to involve the Santa Clara
facility, among others. As with political control technology, many readers
may have trouble accepting that this technology exists, or could have been
used in 911. The weight of circumstancial evidence alone, warrants
a look, however.
Raytheon is involved in something called project Global Hawk, which is technology to pilot sophisticated multiple engine aircraft remotely. It has been considered for application in civilian airliners, bombers, fighters, and surveillance aircraft. It is known to have been installed in each of these types for testing purposes, and a special surveillance |
| airframe of the same name has been constructed and flown between the
US and Australia without a human on board. This aircraft was described
as the size of a large civilian passenger jet - and this test took
place well before 911. Unverified reports are that each of the 911 passenger
jets which crashed that day had recently been serviced at Raytheon facilities.
I know nothing of this, but it fuels speculation, given that FBI and the
airlines refuse to release the names of the passengers who are claimed
to be terrorists.
The significance lies in persistent alternative theories that the 911 jets were not piloted into their targets at all. Easily dismissed as ëwild rumors' by those predisposed to do so (I was one of those for a time,) it has not gained wide acceptance among cautious thinkers. I am however less certain this is the best judgment, having separately discovered a number of interesting facts regarding Raytheon personnel familiar with Global Hawk, and the terrorists of 911. It turns out that there are a couple of very disturbing ëcoincidences'. For space' sake, I will review these in brief, here, without footnotes. All this is further documented in the Time Line, my newsletter, and by investigative author, Daniel Hopsicker, who gets credit for almost all discoveries in this section. Visit his Mad Cow Productions Web site for an enjoyable read. First, Raytheon operates a facility believed associated with Global Hawk right next door to the flight training schools where the 911 terrorists trained in Florida. The specific Raytheon facility is set up specifically for flight simulators, a very key tool for operators of Global Hawk or would-be pilots of jumbo jets. either way, this is important because it implies the possibility that the flight schools were intended to be cut outs for the true trainers of the pilots (via Global Hawk technology, or otherwise.) A cut out is a kind of patsy intended to take the investigative heat and, if necessary, blame - to eliminate investigation of the true guilty parties. This Raytheon facility just happened to give a private open house tour to a group of Arabs just prior to the establishment of the flight schools virtually adjacent to them. The flight schools themselves were established by what are seen as CIA operatives likely associated with Iran Contra and drug smuggling through the ëDutch corridor,' as well as other CIA enmeshed businesses associated with current Floridian drug smuggling from South America and Jeb Bush (ibid). These same Arabs, members of the bin Laden and Royal Saudi family, and including the head of Saudi Intelligence, just happened to be in Florida within an hours drive of President Bush's location when the 911 attacks took place. Too many coincidences. More than that, this same Raytheon facility was used to help fly these Arabs out of the country on a CIA provided jet associated with the Flight training schools after 911. This specifically required a Presidential order to the Federal Avaiation Administration and NORAD because all commercial flights had been banned as a result of 911. But as much a smoking gun as that tangled web of high-level governmet participations appears to be, it is nothing compared to this... What is also separately documented and completely against the odds is
that three of the four aircraft which crashed on 911 were populated with
multiple persons employed by Raytheon with knowledge of Global Hawk, including
very high program managers, engineers, and corporate executives. Thus,
if there were any use of Global Hawk in 911, these would be the people
who might be able to deduce that fact, and who thus might need to be eliminated
- ironically, by the use of that very technology in 911. It is also somewhat
disturbing that immediately after 911, Raytheon sold off its Global Hawk
division and dismantled all infrastructure which supported it. It could
represent a move to dismantle and cover up evidence, and establish plausible
denial. Again, given the speculative nature of this line of thought, I
do not include it as an indicator. But if I were the reader, I'd want someone,
somewhere, to investigate further...
|
 |
Ali is by now traveling all over the United States and even
the world; 58 trips undertaken abroad (10,) reportedly on behalf of Osama
bin Laden (8.) Ali is conducting trainings of terrorists abroad,
as well as in this country, and delivering messages and handling financial
transactions (8) for bin Laden. In 1990, When raiding the home Nosair,
the suspected killer of Rabbi Kahane,
police would uncover a cache of evidence of Ali's training of and close
association with the terrorists, and turn it over to FBI. The bulk of these
are training materials consisting of US Army manuals and documents, and
even videos. But also among the materials were Army documents marked ëCLASSIFIED'
or ìTOP SECRET' pertaining to Ft. Bragg and operations there, as
well as
Bright Star, and other unspecified
materials (1.) This is exactly the kind of low-level security material
a double agent might be allowed to offer the enemy as proof of loyalty
- a significant indicator.
Perhaps most condemning were the ëunspecified materials,' documents which discussed how to target and destroy (unnamed) tall buildings described as (9) ëthe pillars of their (American) civilization.' This cache of evidence falling into FBI hands is well beyond the earlier videotaping of Mohamed's training actions. While these planning documents |
 |
In 1991, Ali returns to Afghanistan and once more briefly fights the Soviets along side Osama bin Laden and other Mujahadine (1.) He next helps Osama relocate from the Afghanistan to the Sudan (3.) Other sources indicate the true relocation was from Pakistan (10,) which would make some sense as Osama and other Mujahadine fighting the Soviets were originally supported by and protected by the Pakistani intelligence service (ISI.) Osama and much of his organization were likely in Afghanistan, but their official 'safe house' headquarters were likely in Pakistan. But training camps and, likely, recruitment teams still remained in Afghanistan. In 1992, Mohamed returned to Afghanistan to help train terrorist recruits in explosives and other topics (3.) His power, influence, and trustworthiness within the terrorist circle is now quite significant, and about to get even better. |
 |
By 1993, Ali was in Africa (3) where he participated in the planning stages of embassy bombings which would take place some time later. He set up a darkroom where he and developed covert surveillance photographs he himself took of the embassy compounds (and other potential targets.) According to his own testimony, he worked personally with Osama bin Laden to determine exactly where the bomb-filled vehicles would go based on those photographs (ibid.) But this planning session for bombings yet to come was nothing compared to what happened next. It was time for Ali Mohamed's efforts in New Jersey to pay off. Osama bin Laden's first terrorist cell in the Unitec States was about to report for duty -- with a little help from FBI. |
 |
Also in 1993, a strange event in Canada reveals much about the double agent status of Ali Mohamed, and the ërestrained' relationship between him and FBI. Shortly after the WTC attack, at a time when all of North America is rather ësensitive' to the notion of terrorism, Essam Marouk, an highly placed aid to Osama bin Laden, tries to pass a Canadian border checkpoint (13.) Canadian officials discover he is carrying two false passports. As it happens, the man also appears to be using Ali Mohamed's driver's license (14.) This is a mystery in and of itself. Further, they learn that the man is expecting Ali to meet him when Ali shows up at customs asking for his missing party. This seems guaranteed to generate further investigation. It does, Dudly Doright style. |
|
The Canadian incident would generate a contradiction in
evidence. In US court records of Ali's 2000 pretrial hearings where Mohamed
pleads guilty to terrorism, the 1993 Canadian matter is explained as (14)
"He was in the process of applying for a job as an FBI interpreter and
did not want this (Canada) incident to jeopardize the application..."
Official court statements while admitting terrorism say only that he was
an interpreter?
Hardly. Virtually every news source in media repeatedly refers to him as an informant. The Wall Street Journal specifically says that FBI first used him as an informant in 1993, the same year Mohamed told the Canadians he was working with FBI. Why would this aspect of his relationship with FBI be deliberately concealed from the courts when considering his role in terrorism? It only makes sense if trying to conceal the fact that he was a double agent. This is an absolute indicator. |
|
In 1994 there was a failed assassination attempt against Osama bin Laden (3,) one which has hardly been noted by all of media. Due to his increased standing and his particular background, Ali Mohamed was assigned the duty of training Osama bin Laden's personal body guards (ibid.) He personally handled bin Laden's security for several years afterwards (ibid,) especially when traveling to other nations or meeting with power figures from other organizations - the times where bin Laden and other terrorists would be most vulnerable to traps and attacks. Meanwhile, Mohamed continues to surveil potential terrorist targets for bin Laden (ibid.) He is thus a trusted defensive and offensive asset in the bin Laden camp. |
| The mystery is this. If Mohamed is a double agent, then we must ask why he would so fervently work to protect bin Laden? If such an agent, his role should likely be the reverse. This would be true, of course, unless there is an Operation Northwoods explanation... one which needs bin Laden and his terrorism in order to function to fruition: wars aimed at control of Middle East oil and increasing political control in the United States through oppressive laws and new draconian agencies such as Homeland Security and the Total Information Awareness Office. |
 |
Also in 1994, FBI contacted Mohamed while he was in Kenya and indicated they wanted to discuss matters related to the WTC bombing (3.) Mohamed obediently returned to California and answered their questions in what the official line portrays as unfruitful (ibid.) This is a curious event for two reasons. If Mohamed was not a double agent, he would likely be very wary of any efforts to return to the US in such a matter. Given it was already known that FBI had linked him to the WTC terrorists through his training materials (the Meier murder investigation,) it would surely seem to a genuine terrorist to be a trap to capture him. In such a case, he would need only decline their kind invitation. However, if a double agent, it would not represent a true threat and he would even want to return in order to pass information and get orders. This is an indicator. |
 |
The Grand Game is the code word used in various New World
Order group writings when talking about control of the Middle East and
Caspian region oil and gas reserves. The Council
on Foreign Relations, for instance, has many articles and research
papers in which the Grand Game is primary
topic. CFR, though having no official capacity in government, can be shown
to
virtually dictate
American foreign and intelligence policy.
Remember that Ali and al-Zawahiri have been identified as psychologists adept in manipulating the mind using intelligence community methods. Remember that al-Zawahiri is one of Osama bin Laden's top aids, and his personal physician. In 1995, Ali would host and manage a visit and tour of the United States by al-Zawahiri in order to raise funds for bin Laden's organization through the guise of charity donations. Money from this trip would be used to fund the bombing of the Egyptian Embassy in Islamabad, Pakistan later in the year, killing 17 persons. The US has all along been aware of al-Zawahiri's role and importance with respect to bin Laden. It is inconceivable that the American intelligence community would not be aware of and disinterested in his visit to the United States - at a time the WTC bombing trial is taking place. It is even more inconceivable that they would not take an i |
 |
Was Ali Mohamed a double agent? In 1998 the US Government revealed the existence of such a double agent identified only as CS-1 who provided critical information on the Osama bin laden operations to them. Intelligence supplied from CS-1 indicated a number of things which would seem to be experiential matches with Ali Mohamed. For one, CS-1 said that there had been a three-way alliance involving the Islamic Jihad front, Osama bin Laden, and Iran in the time frame of 1993. It talked about specific things done as a part of this deal. It sounds exactly like the deal arranged for by Ali Mohamed which gave Osama so much power and capability, as well as direction (1990-1993.) There were other revelations from this same time frame, too. CS-1 was apparently quite chatty... |
 |
Consider what follows as wild speculation and I will take no offense, though the technology spoken of is absolutely real. Remember Operation Bright Star, that joint Egyptian-US war game which takes place every year? Remember Ali Mohamedís origins within Egyptian Army intelligence and his early attempt to work for CIA? Remember that he also went to work in the Security section of Egyptair? These facts will converge in a single event, along with the notion of political control technology, which is also something Ali Mohamed was thought to have been well trained in. Though both Ali Mohamed and his FBI/military-intelligence handlers were clearly a benefactor of what took place on Oct 31, 1999, it is equally clear he was not part and parcel of the effort to cause it to happen. Regardless, it is a very intrigued filled event, starting with the mystery of how it happened, in the first place. Timing, or WHEN it happened, is perhaps the clue that tells us where to look... |
|
Media is now busy trying to convince you and me that Ali was a mole in American intelligence, a double agent working for the terrorists against the US, duping our poor, hapless intelligence community with very sophisticated methods. If this were true, the great bulk of this article would be rendered moot and invalid. Indeed, the primary basis as well as the specific charges against the US government would be seen as foolish. Thus it behooves us to see if media is right in this assertion, an assertion only made once it was realized that Ali was a political liability to the Bush Administration. It simply would not do to admit that Ali worked for the US, as it would hang the bastards at DOD, Langley, and the White House. Got rope? |
| Media easily achieves this goal - they simply slant events for the
purpose and choose to ignore events and facts which dispel the notion.
This is something MIIMís media is very good at doing. But this article
is attempting the reverse. It offers all the events to let you decide for
yourself, and specifically, unlike media, reveals those which dispel the
notion that Aliís loyalties were to bin Laden. These same events
make clear that it is indeed the reverse: Ali was a mole in the terrorist
camp, a double agent working for the US military-intelligence community.
Consider just these three, each of which could stand alone to meet the
need. Together, they paint a consistent picture. Ali is our man, not theirs.
The only problem is, our man is a criminal, as are his employers. Know
how to make a noose?
If Ali were working for bin Laden, only, and not serving US interests, he would not have pled guilty. The guidelines taught to terrorists on how to behave once caught is to plead innocent and demand a trial, and indeed, to take every action to prolong that trial and force the entry of as much evidence as possible. This allows the trial to become a political platform and to ideally force the government to present evidence which reveals sensitive intelligence gathering methods and resources. The terrorists can then work to destroy these resources and neutralize the methods. A guilty plea serves only US interests, and more importantly, keeps US complicity via the Northwoods aspect of things out of view. If Ali were working for bin Laden, only, and not the US, he would have had no need to blow his early relationship with CIA. In fact, it would have been the ideal relationship to cultivate for long term benefit. CIA is the one agency most responsible for offensive measures against bin Laden around the world. In like manner, he would have had no reason to quit the military, once there. He would still have been free to cultivate a relationship with FBI, if desired. The switches between CIA to military to FBI were to the advantage of the US, increasing the image that Ali was a successful double agent on behalf of bin Laden (by virtue of being able to infiltrate,) while at the same time, providing him an excuse for not developing serious information resources for the long term (deep infiltration.) Finally, these moves give each agency an opportunity for plausible denial, should Aliís true role come into question. If Ali were working for bin Laden, only, and not the US, he would not have had a need to admit to knowing who the Embassy bombers were, no need to lie at the Grand Jury, and no need to face a trial, or perhaps even return to the US to speak with FBI, subpoena, or no. But these events served the needs of getting him extracted safely out of the reach of Osama, a move which every double agent who is not to be sacrificed must pray for when the heat starts to rise and the risk of being caught gets too high. We are not privy to enough information to know why such a move was seen as needed, but it seems clear that it was, for these moves ended Aliís ability to serve either master. The point is, he would not willingly do these things if working for bin Laden, for they would have ended his ability to do so, and this was a foreseeable outcome in each of the three instances. This step serves the US interests in that it allows them to extract their asset before he cold be compromised and perhaps made to talk, and it allows for the next important step... A review of Aliís court transcripts offer us a glimpse of perhaps why he was being pulled back from the fray. It would not do for him to die in the Afghanistan war which would soon result from 911 - because there is still something useful Ali Mohammed can do for the United States. Remember that one benefit of the war against terrorism is that it allows us to go after the oil rich nations in the Middle East one by one. But each such war must be justified. Iran is problematic because they have dramatically reduced the tone of rhetoric against the United States and have even opted to offer support to America in the war against Osama bin Laden. That, at least, is the public view. But Ali paints a different picture. Remember his pivotal role in cementing a bond between multiple terrorist organizations, and that one of those was Hezbollah, backed by Iran. Indeed, much of Aliís transcript seems to focus upon Iran. He is to be the evidence used by George Bush to go after Iran, once Iraq is ours. His statements are so strong, so clear, and so condemning, that one wonders why we are not going after Iran, even now, instead of Iraq. The answer to that, is that Iraq is more key militarily for establishing further military adventures in the area. It provides a centralized base from which any Islamic state can be smitten, whereas Iran is more peripheral to the region. Further, it is believed that Iraq will be a softer target, given that its people are repressed and somewhat eager to get rid of Hussein. i could argue that this is yet another proof Ali is our man, but it is not necessary. More important, is that it is proof that oil is the fuel which drives the war against terrorism, and which drives Amerikaís Reichstag. Welcome to the Grand Game. Got a tree? My voice is not alone. Key insiders, and others agree Ali Mohamed is a double agent I will close with three quotes. One from a CIA agent, one from a terrorist, and one from Andrew Marshall of the United Kingdomís Independent newspaper. Being outside of the United States and well beyond the grasp of MIIMís tight grip, Marshall paints a clear picture without mincing words. He believes Ali Mohamed is a double agent. At one point, he focuses on the point in time and place where Ali Mohamed was inserted into the terrorism loop and the formation of the WTC terrorist cell. It summarizes our concerns, and points out that Egyptian and Raytheon insiders are not the only ones to die in what might be seen as an effort to protect the identity of CS-1. Quote: ëThere are probably only three people outside the US government who ever knew exactly what role the Al-Kifah refugee center really played, and how far the US helped to build up Mr. bin Laden's organization. One was Mr. Azzam, the charismatic Palestinian who ran the Peshawar operation. He was killed by a car bomb in 1989. The second was Mustafa Shalabi, who ran Al-Kifah. He was murdered in 1991. The third is Osama bin Laden, and he is not telling. And the US government is certainly not about to explain whether it helped create what it now refers to as Public Enemy Number One.í End quote. The terrorist? Mohamed Atef, generally credited with planning the 911 attacks, and who apparently not only knew Ali Mohamed, but was working with him while in the United States. It seems that many of the terrorists traveled under false passports and used code names. Atef, however, refused to give Ali Mohamed the identities he would be traveling under, offering only the code name in communications. Why? He said he "...doesn't want Abu Mohamed al Amriki to see his name, because he was afraid that maybe he is working with United States or other governments." Imagine that. Even fellow terrorists believe Ali was a double agent of the US (1.) CIA agent Larry Johnson was more blunt (1.) ëHe was an active source for the FBI, a double agent.í Looks like both sides think Ali Mohamed was a double agent, and a few investigative journalists who have not been afraid to ask questions appear to agree. I believe he was a double agent. The question is, what do you believe? If you believe as I, then you must also ask what you believe about Aliís true allegiance. A finding in favor of the US military Intelligence community will force you to decide about the existence of a Northwoods like scenario, and the oil wars. I have faith in ëWe, The People.í I believe that once given the facts, they will make the right decisions, and react accordingly. There are many ways to respond that would be useful. Perhaps, if you believe as I do, you should become a Noilwarrior! We need a posse, now that we have a rope and a tree. 1. Joseph Neff, John Sullivan, News and Observer (Raleigh, N.C.) Al-Qaeda Terrorist Duped FBI, Army, Available on line at Papillonsartpalace.com 2. NY Times, Oct 30, 1998 (who in turn cites Boston Globe for some materials) Available on line at Hull Thread 3. Court Transcripts, Manhattan Federal District Court, Preliminary Hearing before Judge Sands, Oct. 20, 2000 (Ali Mohamed pleads guilty, cites his role in terrorism, and avoids a trial. Available on line at Cryptome 4. Reed Irvine, NewsMax.com, Bin Ladenís Military Mole (Reed Irvine heads the Accuracy in Media watchdog group) Available on line at Worldnewstand.net 5. NY Times, Dec 1, 1998 Perhaps the single most complete picture of Ali Mohamed, but as an early piece, it does contain elements contradicted elsewhere. Available on line at the Hull Thread 6. Lance Williams and Erin McCormick, San Francisco Chronicle, Nov 4, 2001. Available on line at infowars.com 7. Voice of Judea (Jewish/Israeli News Service) 8. Colum Lynch and Vernon Loeb, Washington Post, August
1, 1999 - Note that the Washington Post completely ignores Aliís
relationship with CIA, FBI, as well as anything pointing to prior knowledge
and FBI failure to follow up on evidence aimed at Ali.
9. Peter Waldman, Gerald F. Seib, Jerry Markon and Christopher Cooper,
Wall Street Journal, Nov.
26, 2001 and this
link
10. Thomas G. Whittle & Linda Amato, Freedom Magazine - This is an extremely detailed look at the use of psychological warefare, political control technology, and mind control in the terrorism movement as well as the history of its use in the Islamic world. They cite additional good material from CCHR, the Citizens Commission on Human Rights 11. MC Realities by this author - eye witness statements of a conversation between DOD officials and college professors contracted for mind control studies to specifically test MC technology on Islamic students. 12. International Policy Institute for Counter Terrorism 13. Estanislao oziewicz, Tu Thanh ha, the Globe and Mail, Toronto 14. Peter Grier, Christian Science Monitor - this article is flawed in detail presentation and seems to mix a few future statements by Ali in US court as if they were a part of the Canadian misadventures and evident at the time. 15. Andrew Marshall, The Independent (United Kingdom,) Nov. 1 1998 - because this story is written outside of the United States, it is one of the most honest, direct, and fact filled presentations on topic. Available on line at unansweredquestions.com 16. New York Times, Sept. 26, 1998. Reproduced in an article by Michael Hull at newsmax.com 17. Leila Abboud, Columbia University Journalism Dept. project, A Sense of What Was Coming - an excellent piece told about 911 from the perspective of lawyers involved in the trial of the 1998 Embassy bombings who happened to be near the WTC when the aircraft struck, using flashbacks to the trial to show points of reference. 18. USAF military news web site, 19. Noilwar! Time Line 20. Wind Energy Weekly, Vol 15, #684 21. The National Interest, Winter 1995-1996 issue, Lauri Mylroie: This article appears to dissect the terrorist cell from the 1993 WTC attack with great detail, but fails to mention Ali Mohamed, at all. Yet it does introduce us to Emad Salem, another FBI informant/double agent operating within the cell to teach the terrorists the same exact things as did Ali. Images: Mohmaed Ali (BBC); Ft. Bragg JFK Center (US Army); Bright Star (DOD); Spy vs. Spy (Mad Magazine); Global Hawk and Khobar Towers (USAF); Osama bin Laden (AP); WTC (terrorismfiles.org ); Dudly Dooright (Jay Ward Productions); al-Zawarhiri (FBI); Khobar Towers (Time) |
