|
|
| Proofs of Treason, Oil Profits, War Profits, and Power
Grabs
Return to Main Page
I start with a brief apology and explanation of methodology. The NOILWAR! effort has been severely hampered by a number of factors, not the least of which is the lack of time available for keeping the Web site current. Trying to put three books to bed has prevented not only the original NOILWAR! pages from being updated, but the whole of the proparanoid.NET Web site has remained woefully out of date for nearly a year. Funding problems are also a significant factor, preventing the hiring of helps, establishment of a separate dedicated and secure Web site, and proper promotion. I do thank the many who did contribute. The rest of you can best contribute by becoming a NOILWARRIOR!, or purchasing a NOILWAR! T-shirt Iron on image. As a result of these and other mitigating factors, the volume of information collected since NOILWAR! founding has become a small mountain. I have decided the easiest and most direct way to present and best portray this material with due impact and meaning is a time line. A timeline format offers easy-to-grasp elements which steadily reveal the larger picture in a building-block approach. Each block should justify the readerís interest in learning about the next block (or the case made is not strong enough to warrant further consideration - the proof of the pudding, as it were.) In attempting to insure all elements are valid and useful... based on verifiable resources... many items for which I had no time to verify their accuracy or the credentials of their source had to be omitted. For every three items you read, there is one left out which is also supportive of the notion: 911 was indeed domestic state sponsored terrorism inflicted upon us by elements of the US Government in order to achieve multiple long and short-term benefits. |
| The Many Forms of Terrorism
A primer on code word terminology what you don't know can hurt you The Growing Case for
Oil War III:
The Marketing of
On Oil War III
Introducing the Time Line Players
The Search for a Smoking Gun
Time Line for Treason
Kissinger is Spelled W-A-R-R-E-N
Special Reports: US Military-Intelligence Double Agent
Jefferson Airplane's White Rabbit
Wisdoms of Perle
|
Warning: Due to hijacking
some links will not work pending repair
|
| The Many Forms of Terrorism
Copyright © 2003 by H. Michael Sweeney and NOILWAR! See Permissions Statement This article reveals:
terrorism n: The systematic use of terror, esp. as a means of keeping or gainingWhen criminally minded political groups use terrorism to effect controls upon their own government, it is called DOMESTIC TERRORISM. This is the role the US Government would have us think for Timothy McVeigh and the militias. Given certain facts, I donít buy their story for a moment, but except for the existence of a few suspicious ties between the Oklahoma City Bombing and both attacks on the WTC, that's not the issue, here... When terrorism is applied by criminals who operate covertly from within their own nation to effect controls upon another national power, it is called FOREIGN TERRORISM. This is the role initially portrayed for Osama bin Laden in his many attacks on US resources PRIOR to 911. But that was before the oil pipeline deal was in jeopardy. The facts which have unfolded over time would seem to disprove that cover story, a story used to prepare us for buying what comes next. But when covert operation is not required because the terrorists are
permitted access to government resources, financing, and general blessings
of the nation from which the terrorism is launched, it is termed STATE
SPONSORED TERRORISM. They are no longer criminals, but government sponsored
agents. This is the role quickly assigned to Osama bin Laden after 911,
a move which allowed the US military to officially target the Afghani Taliban
(the State,) thereby allowing the Bush administration to clear the way
for the real and unstated goal of the war on terrorism. They tried doing
the same (accusations of terrorism ties with bin Laden) at first with Iraq,
but quickly backed off ONLY because of public outcry -- there was no evidence.
This proves we still have SOME voice left. So now, instead, they are falling
back on worries about weapons of mass destruction and violations of no
fly zone, etc. Regardless, they are still pandering to our fears to justify
an illegal war which is really about control of oil -- as perhaps best
revealed in the
But now, we need a new term, one which describes not the kind of terrorism portrayed for us by the White House and media, but the TRUE form of terrorism at work in Oklahoma City and the WTC/Pentagon, and beyond. When your own government is behind the criminal plots, supplies and funds the training and resources, and uses the terrorism to tighten THEIR political control on YOU (in this case, a long string of draconian measures in the guise of ëHomeland Securityí), what you end up with is... DOMESTIC STATE SPONSORED TERRORISM. Of course, we should not be surprised to find that they made a buck or two on the effort along the way. That is the nature of fascism, as will be explained as the full NOILWAR! case is presented. History is rife with examples of this kind of cannibalistic terrorism,
but the best known example of modern times is Adolf Hitler, who as many
historians contend, had his own henchmen burn the nation's beloved national
library and blame the communists. Called the Reichstag
Fire, it was the vehicle which effectively allowed Hitler and the
Nazi party to come to full dictatorial power of the German Democracy by
means of a declaration of national emergency. This fostered a complete
reformation of the government, a whole new brace of oppressive laws, establishment
of whole new 'national security' agencies (The dreaded SS and SA Stormtroopers)
which were used to effect political control, nationalization of whole institutions
and industries (including absolute control of media), establishment of
an unprecedented war industry, eventual gun seizure from citizens, and
a license to persecute and ultimately imprison and destroy thousands of
communists, and eventually, the Jews and others considered 'unpure.'
If any of this sounds vaguely familiar, there is a reason...
The Growing Case for Domestic State Sponsored Terrorism Copyright © 2003 by H. Michael Sweeney and NOILWAR! See Permissions Statement This article reveals:
Remember that government officials are supposed to avoid even the merest hint or suggestion of impropriety or wrong doing. When they fail to do so, it is media's duty, and that of our Congressional watch dogs, and your duty as a citizen -- to demand a closer look. That BOTH media and the Congress are not only failing to ask appropriate questions... but even going so far as to deliberately overlook the evidence when citizens do complain... is itself evidence of wrongdoing and a cover up. If it looks like a conspiracy and acts like a conspiracy... don't be surprised when it quacks like one. But behind this is an even greater conspiracy for a long-term goal which is better illustrated in Fatal Rebirth, an unpublished book I hope to release very soon. That work involved a ten-year investigation into crimes of the intelligence community and certain power brokers which revealed the possibility of a ëunified conspiracy theoryí, a kind of grand conspiracy behind all the major individual conspiracies of our last 60 years -- all of which are based on even older historical efforts to achieve world domination. It is summed up in a visual form in the Armageddon Machine, which illustrates the manufacturing of the fall of man and the rise of the Antichrist based on manipulation of 'isms' (communism, capitalism, terrorism, etc.) One result of Fatal Rebirth of significance, here, is that it was the basis for predictions of future events based on the deduced (and somewhat obvious, once putting the puzzle pieces together) intent or goal of the larger (unified) conspiracy. Using that theory, I predicted a number of events, all of which have sadly come true with terrible consequence. The first was that Ross Perot and his family would be threatened with violence if he did not pull out of the presidential race against Bush the first. I warned the Secret Service and the Perot camp of my concerns just weeks before it actually happened, exactly as feared, and Perot withdrew from the race. Though I offered to share my basis and material evidence upon which my prediction was made, all Secret Service did was to put me under a five-year surveillance program whenever the President or Vice President came to the Pacific Northwest. Since I know all the license plates for the local Federal agents, and many of their names and faces, I found their efforts most amusing - especially when disguised as a TV station camera crew who video taped ONLY me as Clinton passed within feet of me in his motorcade. For the readers information, I will state that I believe the form of threat used against Perot involved Anthrax. If this is true, it is likely directly tied back to the same persons behind 911, as proposed by the 'unified conspiracy theory' in the first place.
More important to the work at hand, here, was the more detailed prediction: what I call the End Game Scenario. This predicted terrorism which, in turn, resulted in multiple aircraft crashing into multiple buildings, toppling the WTC, and a Middle East war sponsored in part by dramatic swings toward a military-police-state mentality by government. This was expressed and published in the Fall of 1999 on my Web site in the form of a film script based largely on Fatal Rebirth called The Electronic Apocalypse (which is included on my Proparanoid Reference CD-ROM, along with the Preface and one whole chapter and several key Appendix documents from Fatal Rebirth). Though the precise mechanisms of the terrorism were other than the bin Laden variety painted for us by government and media, the important aspects of the key events (staged terrorism, air crashes, WTC collapse, Middle East war with multiple Islamic nations) were all frighteningly prophetic. Indeed, they even involved the bulk of the same background players in my mind as are actually involved today, though I had not the freedom to name them publicly in the book or the script. I wish to God these accuracies had not come to pass, and that these men had not stolen America. Millions will die if they are not stopped, and freedom will die with them.
Copyright © 2003 by H. Michael Sweeney and NOILWAR! See Permissions Statement This article reveals:
I have stated in prior issues of the Professional Paranoid Newsletter that there is a formula for war in the Middle East, restated for simplicity, here: Low oil prices = low oil profits = war = high oil prices = oil/war industry profits. The question is, can a case be made that oil/war industry interests engineer wars in order to increase oil prices and profits. To answer that, let us first take a look at who we are talking about when we say oil/war industry interests. For the most part, they are often the same people/groups. For another way of viewing the impact of the information presented, here, and for specific references useful in verifying some of the statements, I suggest a look at the Time Line for Treason. The Players: Who makes a buck when there is a war OPEC - the cartel of oil producing states have an extreme interest in high oil prices, given that their actual costs to pump the oil out of the ground do not vary except according to their own nationís rate of inflation, which can impact on labor costs and replacement parts for machinery. Chief among these are the Saudi Royal Family, the Fiasals -- many of which are close buddies and business partners with the Bush Family, partners with American oil industry firms, and co-investors in CIA proprietaries and military contractors with Bush and his Administration friends through their investment and leadership roles in the Carlyle Group, which is a holding company for dozens of military contractors (and oil industry firms) Oil Companies (anywhere in the world) get to raise their prices IMMEDIATELY when any expected shortage of supply exists -- the old supply and demand formula. So even though they have yet to pay higher costs to the producers, the price of oil products (heating oil, gasoline, etc.) rises quickly well in advance of any change in actual expenditures for oil at higher prices. Once the shortage manifests in actual higher costs, prices would at some point level out and represent normalized profits (in terms of percentile, but still higher in terms of net profit volume). As a rule, war has NOT genuinely suffered a stifled supply in any dramatic way, because various oil producers (those not directly involved in blockades or other war induced production roadblocks) simply increase production rates --further increasing their profits by virtue of a temporarily larger market share. Of course, once the war goes away, the prices come back down -- but never seem to come anywhere near their starting point. The overall profit level of the oil companies is much higher after the war, and the consumer never gains back what it had lost. We consumers are too dumb to notice that, apparently, and no one in government seems interested in monitoring on our behalf. Military Contractors/Suppliers. That one is not very hard to figure out. All those destroyed weapon systems and platforms, and expended munitions will need to be replaced. So much the better if selling to both sides, even if your own troops end up fighting an enemy armed with weapons your country manufactured. It is an age old story, and no one is better at it than the US Military Industrial Complex -- which I call MIIM (Military-Industrial-Intelligence-Media Complex). A great example is the Carlyle company, which is Of course, that brings us to... The Military and the CIA. The military always wins in a war, its appropriations going through the roof, and Generals tending to get more stars with victories. The CIA is itself deeply enmeshed in the oil industry and in bed with military contractors, having proprietaries in both industries. In fact, two of three Bush appointees to the US occupied Afghanistan (see next) are actually former CIA operatives, both recruited and thrust directly into the White House, the Department of Defense, and oil industry, and back into Afghanistanís new puppet government at the same times (two for one special, we might presume.) Individuals important for the purpose: The George Bush family has extensive holdings in the oil industry at all levels, including the service industry, which are firms providing services needed by the oil industry, such as Carlyle Groups Halliburton. The Bush family further has significant interests in the war industries through Carlyle Group. James Baker of Baker and Botts who has a long list of clients in both the oil and war industries. Dick Cheney hails from Halliburton, and has profited from Caspian region pipeline projects. Condoleeza Rice hails from Chevron. All three George Bush appointees to US occupied Afghanistan, John Maresca, Zalmay Khalilzad as Special Envoy and Hamid Karzai as Interim Prime Minister -- all worked on Unocalís Afghanistan pipeline project, Maresca as a Unocal Vice President. The War Formula Revealed: A review of wars vs. crude oil prices over half a century Now lets take a brief look at the wars. Oil prices are adjusted for inflation/recession to reflect constant 1995 $, and come from the US Dept. of Energy. Their figures are averaged for the year, and thus, the actual highest prices for the year are not reflected. Despite this, the numbers are still rather revealing... WWII (1941-1945) : Oil prices had held between $11.00 and $13.42 for a ten year period. But in the war years, oil dropped to as low as $9.32. By 1949, after the shooting war had stopped and the cold war had begun, oil prices had peaked to above $16, and remained in that strata for some time, and then slowly started downhill. Clearly, WWII in Europe was not about oil, but the Pacific war was -- the US was essentially blocking Japanís access to it. Regardless, it impacted on oil prices and profits. Vietnam (1964-76): Oil had started to approach to the old $11 strata. The war in Vietnam started when oil was in the mid $12 range, but by the time the war had ended, it was an all time high of $20.39. Again, we probably agree this war was not about oil, but it clearly impacted on oil prices. Afghanistan-Russia (1979-1991): This war was argued by various experts as being ideological, religious, political, and oil related. It is largely coincidental to a larger (in death tolls) war between Iran/Iraq (see below). For this reason, the data is essentially identical for the two wars, which could be argued as one in net effect. While Afghanistan was itself not an oil industry player, the bordering Russian states were extremely oil rich -- the Caspian basin. Further, Afghanistan had long been identified as a central key to political power in the region and was often referred to white papers on Grand Game constructs by the New World Order groups. The Grand Game is control of the oil in the region, as promoted by such groups as the Council on Foreign Relations. The CFR and its think tanks, though its primary goals are very much against US sovereignty in favor of a one world government, is probably the most influential power group in Washington DC. It virtually dictates US foreign and domestic policy as well as policy regarding national security (CIA, NSA, FBI, Department of Defense.) The Falklands War (1982): This short war between Great Britain (British Petroleum) and major oil producer, Argentina, should also be combined into thinking about the Iraq-Iran war, below. Though it was a very short lived war, it kept prices high (above $44) for the year -- though otherwise representing a mere hiccup in oil exports from South America. Yet lessons learned from the ëdouble whammyí effect of wars effecting oil producers on two continents would prove useful, later. The Oil Wars: The first wars which revolve almost purely around oil interests Oil War I, Iraq-Iran war (1980-1988): This was clearly and ideological war, but between two major oil producing states, it illustrates to the oil and war industries where the money comes from. When combined with the Falkland war and the more localized impact of the Soviet-Afghanistan conflict, which bordered both Iraq and Iran, the impact on oil supply and demand is significant. Oil prices had slipped from the $20 level to near $19 when war talk started to send oil prices back upward. By the second year of the war, prices had peaked at $52.42, a new all time high. It remained above $30 until the war started to die down and other oil producers had taken up the slack. As the war ended, however, there was a glut on the market from the increased production and the renewed access to Iraqi and Iranian oil, and oil immediately plunged to a low of $16.81. The first gas lines were in this period. Oil War II, Iraq-Kuwait/US war (1990-1991): Iraq is feeling a financial bind, and oil prices are not what they used to be. Further, other OPEC nations seem bent on pumping a lot of oil which means both a low profit to Sadam Hussein and a low market share. That may be, in part, why he invaded Kuwait. Regardless, all experts agree that he was after their oil fields, if not their oil customers -- and better seaport access for oil exports, Iraq being largely land locked. From a low of $15.76 entering the period, oil shoots up as Desert Storm looms to a high of $23.01. This war is definitely about oil, and I call it Oil War I. The Fall of the Soviet Union (1991-1997): This was not exactly a war, but the Soviets had fallen victim to the Cold War. The date of the actual collapse (Dec 1991) is not as important as are the dates shown in parenthesis, which are the dates representing a flood of US oil company investments in Soviet oil resources. These involved a series of bribes in order to gain control at ridiculously low investment costs. This resulted in roughly a 75% ownership or control of all Caspian region oil and gas reserves (a trillion dollar value.) It is mentioned here because it helps explain why George Bush the Fist did not take control of Iraq when the chance existed. To do so would have adversely effected the oil companies attempts to get good prices for ownership of Soviet oil. Oil prices needed to drop as quickly as possible and it would not do to have the Soviets see America as owning the region at that time. Oil War III, the War on Terrorism (2001 - current): By 1994, oil prices had dropped to $13.49, facilitating reasonable prices for Soviet oil fields to American oil companies. But now, they needed a way to export the oil -- and to get prices back up. The only viable way was the pipeline project through Afghanistan. But the Taliban and their civil war were in the way. So, per other NOILWAR! articles, Osama bin Laden became terrorist, and was moved to Afghanistan to befriend the Taliban. While there, 911 happens and the US immediately associates bin Laden and the Taliban as one. Retaliation commences and, soon enough, attention swings to Iraq and ëWeapons of Mass Destruction.í Simultaneous to all this, we have the Argentina oil shortage going on,
which forces South America and countries relying upon Argentine oil to
get it from the Middle East -- putting more demand on oil from that quarter
and sending prices even higher. Guess what? It turns out that the labor
dispute and political disruption in Argentina seems to be getting its cue
from the George Bush White House and the CIA. The effort to overthrow the
Democratic government through labor revolt is being secretly stimulated
by George Bush for no apparent reason. There is no fit to US foreign policy
-- but it is a fit to oil industry profit motives. For more on this, take
a look at an article by W. Clark at the Independent Media Center.
This all sends oil prices skyward, steadily. As of this writing, they have eclipsed $30 a barrel - that being in 2003 dollars, not 1995 dollars. Using the gold standard as a guide, 1995 to 2003 conversion is ten to one (it takes ten times as many dollars to buy an ounce of gold - $35 vs. $350); making it $300 a barrel equivalent. Ergo, gasoline is predicted to be $2 a gallon by spring, perhaps $3 by summer. Now that's a lube job! But it gets worse. What we are looking at is another 40% potential boost due to arbitrary manipulation of monetary standards... The Euro Gold Standard, OPEC Black Gold Standard, and worthless I.O.U.s from Uncle Sam We could name this section ëWhy War Canít Wait.í If we do go in and take control of Iraq ëtemporarily on behalf of freedom loving Iraqisí, what impact will that have on oil profits? Well, as it happens, it will significantly impact on them. It will, in fact, represent a whole new formula. This new formula has to do with a kind of ëwild cardí situation which has never before existed -- the creation and emergence of a dominant new monetary standard in the world, the Euro Dollar. As it happens, the US dollar is dwindling rapidly against the Euro. Currently, they are almost at parity (1 Euro = $1), though when the Euro first came out, it was worth much less than a dollar. This has a significant role in American oil company profits -- and indeed, all major US corporations doing business abroad (megacorps.) It even effects certain ëalliesí of George Bush in his war efforts in the same ways and for exactly the same reasons:
As it happens, Iraq had been forced by the US embargo and other pressures to switch Iraq from US dollar (pretend money -- Federal Reserve I.O.U. notes) trade to Euros (based on a real Gold standard). This involved not only his oil sales but his $10 billion in cash reserves held in European banks from oil sales -- a fund established as part of the embargo in order to provide food and medical supplies for Iraqi civilians. Seems that instead of buying those goodies, he is borrowing Euros against it, and spending that wherever he pleases. But the real story is that this has strengthened Iraqís financial picture significantly, by up to 30% over what it would have been with US dollars. The rest of OPEC has eyed this and is considering switching, too -- or perhaps establishing their own money standard based on oil (black gold.) And this brings us to why Tony Blair is such a stuanch Oil War III supporter, and the Germans and French are not. Blair, like Bush, is not really worried about weapons of mass destruction... he and those in British Petroleum's Boardroom are worried about the same thing the American oil companies are worried about. If the exchange standard for oil changes, economic experts predict a virtual recession for the US, and American oil companies may stand to loose another 30-40% in attempting to convert US dollars for Euros in order to buy oil. Great Britain is in the same fix, because they refused the Euro in favor of the English Pound which is also failing against the Euro almost as badly as the American I.O.U.s. France and Germany, on the other hand, use the Euro, and thus, hope the war is a bust. That means a strong Euro and better buying power -- especially for oil. But if the US invades Iraq and takes control, one of the first things expected of George Bushís puppet government officials installed there is to revert Iraq back to US Dollars for petro -- especially in sales to Europeans. In such a move, OPEC would be hard pressed to move ahead to any conversion strategy, because it might result in a production war which sends prices low (for both standards.) In addition, George Bush is in a key position to blackmail select OPEC leaders (especially the Saudi Royals) for their funding of Osama bin Laden... ëPlay ball, Faisal, or you might be next in line for Americaís New War!í Itís that same old carpet of gold or carpet of bombs argument, all over again. Thus it is no coincidence that virtually every country in favor of war with Iraq is not using the Euro standard (i.e., all those Slavic/former Soviet states)... or is partnered with America in oil ventures in the Caspian (i.e., Turkey...) and every country which has come out publicly against the war is a Euro nation. The only noted exception is the Soviet Union, which while both partnered with the US and not on the Euro, has non the less opposed the war. This may be because they view with alarm and suspicion the series of Oil Wars for profiteering in the region, and the ultimate price they may have to pay if the US controls the bulk of the entire world's supply of oil short of the Argentines. And perhaps they know about Bush and friends adventures there and fear more trickery is afoot akin to that used against the Soviets, resulting in loss of control of their own oil reserves. So the new formula is War = Euro x 0 = (US$ and £) x 1.7 x Oil Profits x Caspian Reserves. Perhaps a million people will die before it is over, but the equation does not factor that in. Boardroom math is like that; better to spill red blood and have black ink on the bottom line than to save lives and have red ink at the bottom line. So every one but Bush and friends gets it in the end. So, I guess there is only one last thing to say: Please pass the Vaseline. On second thought, I probably canít afford it, since it is petroleum based. Iíll use butter.
Copyright © 2003 by H. Michael Sweeney and NOILWAR! See Permissions Statement This article reveals:
We all rightly have a natural aversion to false advertising -- the ultimate form of which, in the intelligence community, is called disinformation. That we are victims of it can be seen by close review of the time line offered herein. The time line itself contains the needed proof references any Doubting Thomas should find suitable. This article is merely to tease the reader that they will want to know more. To fail to seek to know more is to sign on and underwrite the sellout of the nation and the world to an evil so dark that the Antichrist, alone, might eclipse it. Indeed, the Antichrist may be the ultimate benefactor, if not the author of these dark pages in our history. I use marketing as the presentation allegory because it is so very appropriate. Disinformation, you see, only works when it is cleverly and relentlessly presented in message form. It takes marketing know how, which is why CIA owns and operates its own PR and Advertising firms, and its own motion picture and music studios, media and broadcast houses, and even newswire services. That these operate in and cater to only one principle audience, Americans, should cause us all to ask what mission CIA has in the United States which justifies these firms and their use against us? I thought CIA was supposed to influence and topple enemy governments... The process of marketing is simple, and has strong parallels to the topic at hand. You first do some basic market research to find out what people need or want -- or can be induced to so think. You then conduct R&D on how to best manufacture that product so that it meets that need. You must have a factory and some tooling, and a production line monitored by quality control. You can then start production and launch a marketing program aimed at those who will become distributors or resellers of the product. When the product is deliverable, you launch an advertising blitz to reach the consumer. This requires a good PR firm. You need great packaging. You need slogans. You need a spokesperson. Boom. Dealers place orders, and consumers line up. Sales happen, and with a good marketing plan and a sellable product, you earn repeat customers. So what does this have to do with Osama bin Laden and the war on terrorism? Iíll tell you -- and in so doing, answer the following horrendous and fearsome questions. The Anser is even more horrific, once you understand its fullness... The questions are these: what if the War in Iraq had been planned since 1996, and plans of terrorism in support of the need even earlier? What if the war had nothing whatsoever to do with weapons of mass destruction or terrorism, or the ideological, pathological shortcomings of Sadam Hussein? What if the driving political and social force was not the promotion of democracy over dictatorships, not moral righteousness or indignity born of 911, but the conspiratorial goals of fascist elite globalists? What if it had to do with world domination through control of oil with the aim of creating a one world government under a single leadership? What if 911 was nothing more than a planned marketing tool to sell us on the idea of a war with terrorism as a side show distraction from the true intended course? What if our own intelligence community and government leaders were conspiratorial participants in every step of this marketing effort? Were it true, some would cry for armed revolt. If a government and its military kills its citizens to make a profit, to take away civil rights that their power over the people may increase, and to destroy religions that theirs is the only choice remaining... then that is sufficient cause to take up arms by all historical accounts. The day may soon come that Americans will have no choice but to surrender themselves and their children to live under the yolk of such tyranny, or to unite against the treason in order to restore the government to its true Constitutional form. Scant little time is left for reason and protest, and political process to have good effect. These are the stakes which have been placed on the table for us by criminals who would rule the world. Only you can effect the needed change, but unless you are well informed, you will not even have the chance. Read and learn, learn and decide, then act according to your conscience. It is hoped that the time line will be your guide, and the referenced resources the proofs you require in order to demand accountability by government.
Market Research: In 1996, the Institute for Advanced and Strategic Political Studies, a US-Israeli globalist think tank environment undertook a study of the future of Israel and the Middle East towards the turn of the century. The conclusion, in part, was that the one key element to any long term peace and stability would actually hinge upon a preemptive attack strategy -- as well suggesting who should be targeted. The report specifically sought the future destruction of Iraq's political power, military capability and sociopolitical influence in the region, thinking Iraq central and core to resolution of all other issues. Chief architect of this brilliance was one Richard Perle, who soon becomes Chairman of the next Bush Administrationís Defense Policy Board. Other members of the IAS group, themselves from a variety of other think tanks, also joined the Bush team. This highly coincidental matter might be of little natural concern, except that it is followed immediately by a more curious and related event. R & D: In 1997, before Bush is even a serious candidate, Perle and a whole cadre of his associates to include Bush family friends such as Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld get together and form something called the Project for the New American Century. It is a globalist think tank organization with ties to the intelligence community. It has lofty goals which would seem to include, well... the blueprint for the war with Iraq. It proposes a long list of key steps needed to allow the US to undertake such a war, virtually all of which are adopted by the new Bush Administration, which just happens to include most of NPACís founding members. But America canít just have a war, you see. In America, We, The People decide if there is to be war, through our Congressional Representative system. Thus, someone must create that reason, the product we will want to buy. Distributors and Resellers: Also in 1997, former National Security Advisor, Zbigniew Brzezinski, writes a book which is perfect to the purpose of convincing Congress and other power hitters and decision makers of just which side the bread will be buttered. Brzezinski, by the way, is a globalist icon, a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Trustee of that groupís own intelligence community tied think tank, the Center for Strategic and International Studies. When he talks, elite power brokers of the world listen. His 1997 book, The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives, puts all said thus far into contextual summary. He starts by demonstrating that the Euro-asian regions are critical to world power. He then describes the Caspian oil reserves as the key to control of all of Eurasia.?US global primacy, he argues, depends on control of the Caspian and its oil resources, and the viability of South East Asia is tied to access to that oil.?He then laments that this goal cannot be met "except in the circumstance of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat." Note: The message would be clear to anyone who willing to stray from between the lines: to gain control of the region (translation, world power and massive fortunes), there must be some appropriate threat. In absence of such a threat, the only recourse is to manufacture or sponsor such a threat and market it for maximum effect. Sometimes such a threat is in the form of a idea or movement, or perhaps a military power. Sometimes it is in the form of a person, or a mixture of these things. In the intelligence community, such a manufactured person is sometimes referred to as a straw man (someone to attack to make the attacker look good). The person is also sometimes called a patsy, and a cutout (does not usually know who the real villain is, and thus, cannot spill the beans). The book does not say any of this, of course -- it is only selling the notion of World Power and lamenting it as unachievable at the time. Someone else will sell the means to take advantage of his ideas (terrorism.) Those seeking power are about to be baited. Time passes and marketing enters a new phase. Globalist papers are issued from numerous sources, mostly affiliated with the Council on Foreign Relations, a globalist group with ties to and influence upon the intelligence community and all of government. These papers guide American power brokers both in the political and the corporate world towards the need for a pipeline in Afghanistan, but lament that such a pipeline cannot be built because the Talibanís revolution and (later) the growing threat of terrorism prevent it. But these ads still target not We, The People, but the movers and shakers who represent us in Congress, and especially the corporate boardroom players who will profit from the war, or from the oil, or from both. Congress tends to listen to the corporate types, because that is were election money comes from. Still, something else is needed to sell the notion to you and me -- terrorism. Read the rest of this article Return to top
Copyright © 2003 by H. Michael Sweeney and NOILWAR! See Permissions Statement This article will reveal the true goals and forces
behind the War in Iraq
Predictions are easy to make, near impossible to make correctly. Publilius Syrus, in Moral Sayings (1st Century, B.C.,) said that ëThe future struggles that it may not become the past.í The ultimate expression of that thought is a future which is successful in the effort: Armageddon, and the end of the world. If history ends, after all, the future cannot become the past -- at least it will not be recorded if no one is present to mark it down. Of course, end time prophecy of any sort, whether it be from the Bible, the Quran, the Sanskrit, or Satanic sources, from the lore of Nostradamus, American Indians, or the seers of the ancient Egypt, or any other source, including scientific and logical deductions... is at best a thing of heady confusion and ambiguity. In the end, only time will tell us the true prophet from the foolish. Welcome to BushLaden Air, and hijacked flight 666. I am no prophet, and I am most likely very capable of being foolish. But there is a graphic image, an artwork, which is the visual depiction of the New World Orderís ëengine which drives the world.í It sums up pictorially and philosophically the battle for control of man and earth, and is entitled, the ëFormula for The Fall of Man and The Rise of The Antichrist: The Armageddon Machine.í In simplest terms, it depicts the forces upon mankind at the nation-state and personal level, forces wrought by the various belief-structure ëismsí of our world: capitalism, socialism, fascism, patriotism, terrorism, communism, fundamentalism, nationalism, zionism, pacifism, globalism, and so forth, ad nausium. It reveals an onion of many layered power groups and an intricate and well coordinated array of resources and power, all working smoothly against the will of God, and the wishes of man for pursuit of happiness and the expression of free will. Ad nausium, indeed. I prefer to believe as Ferris Beuller, who on his Day Off (John Hughes, 1985, Paramount Pictures), said ë"Isms", in my opinion are not good. A person should not believe in an "ism". He should believe in himself.í As Christian I would summarize the Armageddon Machineís interpretation of the effects of ismology this way; for thousands of years, the dark powers from the bowels of the earth have sought to divide and conquer manís heart, spirit, mind, and body. The religious give it names and descriptions appropriate to their understanding, such as Satan tempting man with seven deadly sins that cause us to have spite for one another, and to separate us from our God. They seek to divide and conquer. Though the religious aspect of it has import for the salvation of oneís soul, for the purpose of this presentation, such is merely a core concept, a building block for understanding. I seek not to preach, here; but if what I say moves one to fear for their lives in the future, then by the same reason, they should also fear for their souls. It is one and the same perilous end for both, if correct. And what is our God, then? It is for each individual, wrong or right, whatever we choose to worship. And if by wiles or by trickery, we can be induced to worship or follow after an ism, rather than our Lord and Creator, then we are set apart from our brothers and sisters on earth, and certainly our Lord, and are thus much easier to conquer. Even choosing to follow our Lord, we can be divided into sects and set apart from our brethren and our Lord. It is easy for those practiced in the art: Divide us with our petty differences, large or small, and let us fight one another instead of fighting evil with good. Tempt us from our Lord by leveraging our greed and fears against us. In the words of a relative of mine, one Mr. Bailey of the famous Barnum and Bailey Circus... ëHurry, hurry, hurry... this way to see the Egress!í He knew deceit could quickly divide the crowd of slow moving gawkers to make room for new paying customers to his show, especially those foolish enough to rush to see what an egress was; the French word for 'exit.' Oversimplified, perhaps, but such an explanation fits well with the basic principles involved. But it is only a building block, a layer. The thing is an onion, a mystery peeled back layer by layer to reveal yet another facet, another meaning, another goal, another powerful force at play. By now, the reader is probably falling asleep, and wondering what this has to do with Oil War III and the New World Order. In answering that, and attempting to anchor the wandering mind, let us simply look to the future, and in so doing, reveal the layers and the mechanisms of the Armageddon Machine, as well as the identity of its architects and generals. Please place your seats in the upright position... First know that I have no copyright on wisdom or knowledge, and certainly no psychic skills that might let me make useful predictions. However, I have an ally, or two. One is Dr. Matthew C. Wells, PH.D., who wrote a very interesting little book called Parallelism: A Handbook of Social Analysis. The heady title is nothing compared to the weight and impact of the content. So revolutionary are the concepts within its pages that the intelligence community of the United States has apparently conspired to prevent its disclosure. Dr. Wells came to me for help, and in helping him, we created an insurance policy, one effective enough for him to proceed with his work. Why should CIA or anyone else in government care about his theories enough to suppress them? Because it represented a very scientific means for predicting the political future of a given nation. By future, I mean who comes to power, the changes in social, economic, and military affairs, wars that might be evoked, and the victims thereof, as well as the outcome. I helped Dr. Wells by playing the roll of editor and critic (if I could understand what he was saying, then anyone could, and the book would be truly useful instead of being lost in lofty concepts for only those of high I.Q. and education.) In undertaking the task I learned to appreciate his work and, to a degree, to understand how to apply his practical and workable concepts. If it will help the reader to understand the importance of his work, know that in its first use as a theory, Dr. Wells successfully predicted, in a published journal some years in advance, several changes in power, naming political parties and even individuals involved, the victors, and the aftermath that followed, to include wars and further internal political turmoil. Event after event has come to pass over something more than a decadeís time, without a single failure, to date. Apparently, the future has not struggled quite hard enough to escape unforeseen. Apparently, CIA and certain persons who pull their strings. I do not refer to Congress or the President, but the real power in our world, those that control things quietly from the Shadow and make them bump in the night; the New World Order tycoons of power. They fear such look ahead capabilities, for it can be used to reveal their own dark plans to the likes of you and me. They fear us more than the armies of other nations. Just why they fear you and I knowing it will be clear by the end of this article. In addition to Dr. Wells, I have an insider or two who graciously act as sounding boards and offer useful commentary or little known facts that make a difference. One is an oil industry insider, one with former military intelligence background as well as service to his government in high office. This European gentleman's expertise in the oil industry is such that major oil companies and governments pay him handsome sums for his advice. I get it for free. Other insiders from within various intelligence agencies or multinational companies have been contributory, as well. One of these is a brave soul who has already been involved in several wars in Iraq. He was a member of Saddam Hussein's Republican Guard. He fought in the bloody ten-year war against Iran, and in the bloody ten minute war against the US after the ten second invasion of Kuwait. Do not think harshly of him, for he also worked along side CIA in futile attempts to dethrone Hussein, and in attempts to put off the slaughter of the Kurds by Hussein. He is a Kurd, and a marvelously interesting person. Return to Top Return to Proparanoid.net Wisdoms of Perle
Three articles condensed from The
ProParanoid Newsletter, and combined, here
In this article you will learn:
Back to Perle, a bad man who is described in many circles as a hawk on Iraq, and in those circles brave enough to risk charges of anti Semitic thinking, of being a lobbyist for Israel. They might be right, since he is a member of the Advisory board of JINSA, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs and he has served in many similar groups supportive to Israel. I do not rank that as a sin, but accuse him of far worse, than that. I accuse him of being a New World Order lynchpin. He is a ranking member of Rockefellerís Council on Foreign Relations, for instance, where he headed a CFR study on non lethal options in overseas contingencies. This is a polite way of describing political control technology and covert operations designed to overthrow governments. But if CFR is a globalist organization, we have to give Perle double black marks because he was also one of the founding members of PNAC -- the Project for a New American Century. This group deserves its own article, but there is not time enough, today. I will brief you on it, but first, we must learn its source. PNAC was a 1997 organization, but in 1996, Perle and a few friends from his JINSA and RAND Corporation connections put together something else. It was a joint IsraeliUS think tank that took a close look at the future of Israel. As found at <http://www.proparanoid.net/noilwar.htm#marketing> this group decided the fate of Iraq well before Bush II was a tiny chad forming on ballots at the toilet paper factory. They decided Iraq had to fall, and a shoot first approach was appropriate (simplified version.) Perle and the bulk of his friends at this think tank, the Institute for Advanced and Strategic Political Studies, all came back to the US to form PNAC, joined by the likes of pals Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney. Just by chance, mind you, PNAC adopted essentially all of the findings of the Israeli think tank, and then sets about to determine just what kind of White House would be best suited to seek such an end, and what policies it should implement in order to best facilitate it. What they came up with, of course, is what we now have, right down the line, point by point. And you thought the election process was about choice. You thought the Office of the President was to lead the nation and guide governmenton how to best proceed. You thought wars were fought because we were forced into it. But wait -- it gets worse. These manipulations are revealing and insightful on how strings can be pulled so easily in Washington these days... but nothing compared to other Wisdomís of Perle. As recently published in New Yorker Magazine by Seymour M. Hersh, Perle has been a little naughty. War Prophets for War Profits, from Iran Contra to BCCI, and back, again First, recall that I implied that DPB members sometimes stood to profit by little policy changes at the Pentagon and the White House... like war with Iraq, terrorism, et al. Turns out Perle is just such a businessman, along with at least two other DPB members, forming a firm which is called Trireme Partners, L.P. The firm is involved in providing venture capital to firms specializing in Homeland Defense. Shades of political control technology! DBP advised in favor of establishing Homeland Security -- exactly two years to the day before 911, two years before it was even needed. Imagine that marvelous foresight. Prophets of profits. Those of you familiar with the Microprose computer game called Civilization,
will know what a Trireme is -- that little tiny boat that canít
go far from shore without being sunk by high waves. Hmmm. Perle must not
know the meaning, or he is risking much, because he has traveled far from
shore on Jan 3. And, it seems he got hit by a big wave, one which just
might sink him.
This leaves us with Shrub I connected the front end of the links between BCCI and Iran Contra in those loops, and Jeb Bush the rear end, which is appropriate, perhaps. Just one more reason to view 911 and all that has followed as an extension of George Herbert Walker Bushís Grand Game. Of course, he is just a facilitator. The Game belongs to the New World Order crowd. And regarding the NOILWAR! position on things, and whether or not oil has anything to do the DPB or the war in Iraq... we have this quote from the article recounting a dialog at the last DPB meeting between Boardmembers: ìHillman (DBP Board) said the old contracts are bad news; he said we should kick out the Russians and the French. This was a serious conversation. Weíd become the brokers. Then weíd be selling futures in the Iraqi oil company.î And regarding the view from the Saudi side, this quote from a member of the Royal Family and former Saudi Ambassador to the US, Prince Bandar bin Sulatan: ìThere is a split personality to Perle... Here he is, on the one hand, trying to make a hundredmilliondollar deal, and, on the other hand, there were elements of the appearance of blackmail ó ëIf we get in business, heíll back off on Saudi Arabiaí ó as I have been informed by participants in the meeting.î Perle has attempted business with the Saudi, before, trying to sell security equipment to the Saudi government after the Gulf War. Apparently, Bush did not pave a clear enough path and the deal fell through. Perle seems to hold no grudge -- unless you think supporting an initiative at the Pentagon to dismantle the Saudi regime evidence to the contrary. BushLaden enterprises at its best. For an eye opening look at the makeup and background of the DPB, visit <http://www.larouchepub.com/ other/2002/2933what_is_dpb.html>, where you will find many of the Boardís members are JINSA members and PNAC members. Also on board are Henry Kissinger, Rockefeller's boy and Bush darling. What a coincidence that Rockefeller was in the Nixon White House while it disintegrated due to attacks led by Bush the Firstís Bay of Pigs team. To learn more about the BCCI and Iran Contra relationships, visit the Time Line for Treason, already mentioned. Global Dominance and the Grand Game of OPEC Dominoes in the Middle East Trust me, Iím not ranting, here. I will offer proofs, not just opinions. I have repeatedly stated, well before cries of ëwar with Iraqí from Bush, that the Grand Game is only about oil at one level. At another level, it is about control of the World, and establishment of the New World Order, and likely, the seating of the Antichrist; a oneworld government led by one person as foretold in Biblical prophecy. Recall the Armageddon Machine from the last newsletter (now found on the NOILWAR! Web pages at <http://www.proparanoid.net/armachine.htm>) I have repeatedly stated that part and parcel of this plan was a series of wars (or one giant Oil War III) with Islamic nations, one by one. If we looked at the Grand Game as being principally driven by terrorism as its fuel (the excuse,) then we would have to go after Iran, Libya, and Syria, probably in that order of threat (but not strategic order.) But we see we have been distracted by Iraq from the terrorism theme. But we will have our war in Iraq, and it does not seem to fit the terrorism theme. Thus we must ask, just what is the true ranking of future wars? If we passed over the known terrorist states to get at one only marginally considered as possible terrorist, who else might get clobbered out of sequence? Well, there is only one centrally powerful Islamic nation which makes any sense at all. It is Saudi Arabia. I know. You thought they were our allies. Donít worry, we will find an excuse -- like discovering they have indeed been funding Osama bin Laden all these years. Never mind we knew it all along and just waited until now, to say so. Never mind it was blackmail money insuring bin Laden would not foment revolution within Saudi Arabia, even even at times facilitated via CIA conduits, hushed up by the White House, which blocked FBI effort. Believe me, Bushco wonít mind, not one bit. By going after the House of Saud, we not only control the largest OPEC oil producing state in the region, but we get a kind of bonus. All those little dominoes arranged neatly along its southern boarders... dominoes called Emirate States and other nations. Without the House of Saud to protect (some are even called protectorates) these Saudi friendly governments, they will crash and burn with civil wars. Gosh. Perhaps the United States should send in some Marines to restore peace and establish ëDemocracy.í So with one bold move, we get Kuwait, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, Yemen and the United Arab Emirates. Heck of a deal: Buy one war, get Six more for free. But there is apparently yet one more ëfreebie.í That will have to wait, however, because you wouldnít believe me if I told you without explaining, first... Since US Media Sees no Evil, Hears no Evil, Speaks no Evil, Foreign Media Screams it Iíve repeatedly stated that US Media is a willful coconspirator through its MIIM affiliations; we do not get the truth at home, but media around the world is very open and telling it like it is. We should not wonder, then, in light of just one example offered here using Australia, that other nations do not wish to jump onto the Iraq war wagon with Daddy Warbucks Bush. The example, by use of two articles, well illustrates both the existence and the outcome of a US controlled press. Both articles are from the Sydney Morning Herald. The first is dated Oct. 7 and the second Dec. 26 of last year. The first is entitled Oil has always been top of Bush's foreign-policy agenda, and the second, Defense redefined means securing new energy. Collectively, these clearly show that not only is the US seizing oil, but implies in revelation of dates and statements by US officials that 911 was a needed catalyst for military action, actions planned before 911. Iíve said this all along. In presenting the material, here, I will summarize portions, and combine
and reorder other portions to better illustrate and organize the material
into a single presentation. I use ellipse (...) to show these edits, and
(parens) to show my additions. Key passages are in red, or emphasized.
Originals are available at <http://www.otherof
alldepressions.org/1033538848021.html> and <http://www.fairfaxarch
ieves.com> respectively. It starts with important background information:
Quote on: As far back as 1975, Henry ëfor a futureí Kissinger, then secretary of state, said America was prepared to wage war over oil. Separate plans advocating US conquest of Saudi oil fields were published in the 70s. So it should come as little surprise that in May last year - four months before the terrorist attacks on Washington and New York - a battle plan for Afghanistan was already being reviewed by the US Command that would carry it out after September 11.
This was the commutation of plans that had been in works for decades,
but was the first visible sign of their implementation. It rotated the
road signs of American moral and legal values 180 degrees, and made war
on behalf of seizing oil ëOK.í It started with the New World
Order crowd... at the request of George Bush, who as one of his first steps
in office simultaneously established a Presidential Task Force on Energy
headed by Dick Cheney
Quote on. ...in a document commissioned early in the Bush presidency, two key US (NWO) policy groups, the Council on Foreign Relations and the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy, explicitly advocated a convergence of military and energy issues. Their joint report - Strategic Energy Policy Challenges for the 21st Century - approved of "military intervention" to secure energy supplies... (and) forecast an end to cheap and plentiful fuel, with the energy industry facing "the beginning of capacity limitations"... "there is no alternative" and "there is no time to waste", the document projects periods of exploding US energy prices, economic recession and social unrest unless answers are found... It also urged Pentagon participation in Mr Cheney's energy task force. And the report warned that the US was running out of oil, with a painful end to cheap fuel already in sight. Quote off.Oil shortages means redefining enemies as those who have the oil (or the land where a pipeline must be built.) References to the War on Terrorism are before 911 -- how did they know? The same way they knew to start the creation processes for Homeland Security exactly two years to the day before 911. They have a Magic crystal ball. I call it Operation Northwoods -- a 60ís plan signed off on by all five members of the Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff to stage terrorist attacks on American targets in order to foment and make popular a war with Cuba. Involving the US military (pretending to be Cuban military or agents) shooting down of US passenger jets, blowing up US warships in foreign harbors, shooting Americans on our streets, blowing up buildings, and more, all with the goal of creating casualty lists designed to cause Americans to demand retribution: war with Cuba. Any of this familiar? Read the rest of this article Return to Top Return to Proparanoid.net
Copyright © 2003 by H. Michael Sweeney and NOILWAR! See Permissions Statement In this article we will learn: The story of 200 Israeli spies deported
by the Bush Administration
We have been Alice, lost in a wonderland created for us through illusions and dreamscapes fed us by government. The Jefferson Airplane (changed later to Jefferson Starship) gave us good advice on how to deal with such worlds in in their classic hit, White Rabbit. We have yet to awaken, but there is hope we will hear their words, and understand. There are many mysteries for Alice types in the 911 tragedy, but a number of them have a common but heretofore unseen nexus. It is not often that an investigative writer gets a chance to place so many pieces of a jigsaw puzzle into a revealing answer all at once. Usually, it is a slow process of step by step discovery. But, thanks to something called a Search Engine, the right searches can work miracles. But what are the questions to ask? Why did the US deport 200 art students?
|
 |
This at first seemed a tough question, until it is understood they
were actually Israeli spies. While that in itself remains mysterious
(and our media has elected to leave it at that), it is who they were spying
upon and how, which raises the greatest of mysteries. Actually, as
a rule, spies donít do the spying themselves, beyond surveillance;
they recruit others to do it, generally within the organization they wish
to spy upon. The ëAgent spyí is sophisticated and able to use
a variety of means to coerce or convince an ëoperativeí to
do the hard part -- the actual spying. The agent simply collects and reports
the intelligence gathered by the operative. So I have to ask... why would
a network of 200 spies deliberately do the spying, themselves...
and in a way guaranteed to get them caught? We shall see...
And whom did they spy upon, and when? If we accept the brief media glimpses and government statements at face value, they were spying upon our own US government intelligence and law enforcement agencies -- starting in early 2001 . In case you havenít already deduced it, these ëvictimsí are the very people most likely to figure out they were being spied upon. And guess what -- they did figure it out, and right away. Mostly, it was DEA, but secondarily, a wide range of other ëtargetsí were selected: the Secret Service, Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms, US Marshals, the IRS, The US Accounting Office, The USCG, US Customs, FBI, The Environmental Protection Agency, and even a couple of Federal Judges. These are not ësoft intelligence targets.í And, for the most part, these are not very ëmeatyí targets likely to yield much useful information... especially to an ally who already has good access to sensitive data provided to it, for the asking. Thus we come up to a more interesting question to ask. Image from IBIS - Imaginative Book Illustration Society |
Why were they spying on US intelligence and law enforcement?
White knights talking backwards...
 |
We might better get the answer to that by looking at how they
did their spying. Out in the open, clumsily, continually observed, and
generously
offering clues that something was not right. They were frequently observed
diagramming building floor plans -- in plain view of uniformed security
and other ëtargetí personnel. They repeatedly asked strange
questions directly, again, even of uniformed security -- and made statements
that indicated an inappropriate attention to sensitive matters. And they
acted strangely and congregated in suspicious places at suspicious times
-- in vehicles directly traceable to their true identities. In short,
they did all they could to get noticed and identified. It worked.
Cartoon from Christian Science Monitor |
| When questioned, they admitted relationships with known Israeli intelligence
operations or front organizations -- and admitted (in many cases) ëformerí
ties with Israeli intelligence, military, and national security posts.
This clearly made their claimed story of being art students selling art
to get through school highly unlikely. How many CIA agents and Green Berets,
after ëretiring,í wander off to Europe to sell gummy bears
-- as a group? They offered passports showing their true travel -- showing
frequent trips into the US from a variety of red flag points of origin.
This is also curious...
Like many professional spies infiltrating another country, these spies took circuitous routes into the US. Rather than using passports and visas from Israel and taking flights from there, they instead used passports and visas from a huge list of other nations, and in some cases, citizenship papers from those nations. They took round-a-bout flights through other destinations before entering the US, as well. The passports and routes featured countries such as Thailand, Laos, India, Kenya, Australia, Germany, Amsterdam, Canada, and a host of nations from Central and South America. That way, if anyone was caught or compromised, there would not be a ëprofileí of like persons to note and watch for. Yet, later, they undertook to alter their tactics dramatically: They switched targets to law enforcement and the intelligence community and cause people to take notice and ask questions. When asked, even outside of actual interrogation, they even volunteered their factual travel destinations and travel histories in the US without concealment. When arrested, they again volunteered all that information in order to actually create a profile for the FBI, and their friends. It is not only as if they wanted to be caught, but Indeed, they wanted their footsteps traced -- and that is my conclusion. This leads to the next, and perhaps most important question, which in turn will lead us to the answer of the former -- and even more than we bargained for. And what should happen once caught spying?
|
Alice Through The Looking Glass |
A proper counterintelligence operation means you DO NOT ARREST, JAIL,
PROSECUTE or DEPORT a detected spy. Not right away, at least. You let them
go on about their business as if you are none the wiser, and you follow
them, and find out who they work with, what they are doing, and you try
to get the goods on the whole operation. You analyze their true threat,
intentions, and any damage already done. THEN you arrest, jail, prosecute
or deport, and seek to undo the damage. Or, perhaps you infiltrate their
organization and find other ways to take advantage, such as passing along
disinformation. I think a proper counterintelligence response is exactly
what the Israelis wished.
The real spying had already been done well before we were looking their way. They had already entered the United States several years earlier, and had been spying undetected -- on their true target of interest, since 1997. Evidence is that their target was al Qaeda terrorists known to the Israelis to have entered the US with the blessings (a blind eye) of the US intelligence community and military, as revealed in the time line time and again. This is confirmed by German intelligence as reported in Der Spiegle -- the Germans aware of Israeli operations in the US a full year before they deliberately tipped their hands to DEA and friends. I think the Israelis were rightly curious why the US would allow so many terrorists into the country in a way that was literally helpful -- and obvious (in my opinion) to even the terrorists... which would also make the Israelis curious to find out why the terrorists would willingly enter the US knowing they were literally within the jaws of the lionís mouth opened wide. Just how was it that the terrorists knew they would be safe? |
| Thus, the Israelis followed and observed, themselves undetected for
years -- because they wanted it that way and took appropriate care to insure
it. And what did they find while in a true stealthy spy mode? Neither
media nor the US intelligence community seems to have raised this question.
But you can bet that the intelligence community had not only raised it
once aware of their presence, but took steps to answer it -- per the proper
counterintelligence response. Yet in this matter, the appearance is that
the spies were simply rounded up and deported, their only crime being the
spying already cited against intelligence and law enforcement. Why, it
is almost as if government does not us to know what the spies had been
doing all those years before getting so clumsy. Thus, the next question.
What did the spies uncover that caused them to want
to be caught?
Read the rest of this article Return to Top Return to Proparanoid.net
Introducing The Time Line Players
Copyright © 2003 by H. Michael Sweeney and NOILWAR! See Permissions Statement This article reveals:
The most important thing for the first time visitor to the NOILWAR! concept are the principle players: Bush, Cheney and the rest of the cabinet members... and the Carlyle Group and their investors, bin Ladens, Mahfouz, and Saudi royalty: These represent ëprofití opportunities with respect to the Middle East war(s.) Profits from war itself in the same manner as can be shown with oil. And yet other investigators point out even more profit opportunities are shared by at least select of these groups of men and women. These are: biomedical industry investments (anthrax cures, etc.) and related drug industry investments and activities (both commercial and illicit drugs.) However, I have not bothered to further bog the reader down with the countless additional events of these somewhat peripherally related matters. Others are busy with that - as any search engine will tell you. The point is, these folks would seem very likely to love war; its good for their pocket books... And all conspiracies, grand and small, need a kind of operational genius at work quietly in the background to oversee and insure things go bump in the night on schedule. Some people refer to such key persons as ëoperational lynch pins,í as all hinges on their ability to make the plan work. It is a very curious thing that there is a particular name which keeps popping up in Crimes In America. This person was involved in so many criminal matters that it is extremely curious that the law has never really touched him, even when implicated. He is never charged, or if charged, is exonerated somehow before matters get ugly. Others always seem to take the fall, instead. In the trade, these are called ëfall guysí and ëcut out men,í and the one who is always there in the background walks free... walks away between the raindrops without getting wet. His roll not yet understood, that person is present in 911 in a gentle ghostlike manner (detection of his prior adventures in history all started equally ghostlike, and then became more solidified as investigations dug into the matters involved). So you should watch for his name. I suspect it will become much more prominent as things unfold - my guess being something most likely involving Homeland Security. Please specifically send me any tidbits of information which involve this individual. Before introducing him to you, let me describe him in terms of his ëresumeí: He is deeply enmeshed in the American intelligence community, most notably, the National Security Agency; he was involved in the BCCI banking scandal which served the money laundering needs of CIA, the Mob, and the bin Ladens; he was involved in the PROMIS software matter as well as the development of Clipper and Chipper, both of which put ëback door accessí into virtually all key communications and database management systems in government and many more in private sectors; that means he was also involved in the Danny Casolero and INSLAW matters and, perhaps even the development of METC bomb technology this author believes was used in the OKC blast; he was involved in the illegal Red Chinese campaign contribution scandals which ultimately had to do with trading of state secrets to the enemy; he was involved in the background of the Vince Foster murder-called-suicide and cover up, part of what many people are calling The Clinton Body Count. He was involved in the Mena Arkansas drug smuggling scandal which is interesting because an Arkansas State Police Investigator who was blowing the whistle on Bill Clintonís Mena Cocaine connections... who was targeted and silenced by a mailed envelope containing anthrax... exactly as used against Senator Dashle and Congress by ëterroristsí who happened to have access to the US Armyís best weapons grade anthrax; interestingly, this man is the one common denominator in the political campaign efforts and successes of George Herbert Walker Bush, Bill Clinton, Al Gore, and George Walker Bush -- which might lead us to wonder if the rival political party system is really not just a contrived ëdog and pony showí to make us think we have a choice. Read Votescam: The Stealing of America and you will will understand the truth. He in fact was a roommate to Jimmy Carter at the US Naval Academy, where he got his intelligence training; he is a billionaire in his own right with investments going everywhere -- including the provision of seed money for the megacorp Wallmart chain; these investments include banks and other enterprises central to the Hong Kong and Red Chinese infrastructure, an infrastructure infected by and supportive of the illicit drug trade out of S. E. Asia and tied to CIA proprietaries here in America; he was associated with a powerful Floridian law firm Boon, Boon, and Boon located, interestingly enough, a stoneís throw from the terrorist flight training schools; similarly, his Beverly Enterprises is also nearby. In Venice, Florida, where his seat of power in that state is maintained, it is said that nothing big really happens in Florida without his blessings. He is Jackson Stephens. Watch as his name pops up here and there...
But there are also two other key men, both extremely important and involved in 911 related matters. They are extremely important. But in the time line, their identity is concealed until the very last, because it is who they turn out to be in the end which amplifies the significance of all they did leading up to the final dramatic event where they are named. Thus, for the purpose, I have given them code names: , Mr. Z, and Mr. HK. I think you will be enthralled at their progressional roles and dumbfounded at the final revelation of their identities and resulting 'official duties' assigned them by George Bush. Perhaps most telling is the fact that BOTH persons repeatedly transitioned simultaneously from one key parallel and interlocking 'power level' to another, disproving that it is merely their own capabilities that have warranted promotions or career changes. Someone is directing and orchestrating... The audacity and cunning they represent and the associative ties to the Bush administration, CIA, and oil industry, should become the proverbial Albatross around the necks of all involved. But it won't happen, because media cares not to mention it, and thus, the public notices not.
And yet another name to watch for as a shadow player who truly is a smoking gun in his own right is Ali Mohamed. Though a very common name in the Islamic world, the context of materials available make clear we are talking about the same specific individual in every instance. Ali is interesting for numerous reasons: his activities illustrate complicity between Al Qaeda and the US intelligence community and military in very serious ways. Mohamed has a long history of involvement with terrorists, but always a role of undercover operative working with US military intelligence resources. His role in matters is so evidential to domestic state sponsored terrorism and so smoking gun-like that I have given him a special biographical review.
Jump to the Treason Time Line (it is suggested you first read Search for a Smoking Gun, below, in order to better evaluate the time line.) Return to Top Return to Proparanoid.net Copyright © 2003 by H. Michael Sweeney and NOILWAR! See Permissions Statement This article reveals:
The number of people who do not accept government's story on 911 is staggering. Even victim's families have filed a multi-billion dollar law suit against George Bush accusing him of at least complicity. The number of avenues by which such conclusions are drawn... various evidential paths which lead the inquisitive to consider very difficult 'what if' questions... are equally numerous, and appalling in their distasteful implications. And we are right to ask these what if questions when finding inconsistencies and evidence of wrongdoing in government's statements, actions, and policy. It is our duty to challenge government that it verify and justify itself whenever it seeks to dramatically alter or potentially harm the American social contract we call the Constitution. I remind you that this is also media's role, one which they only superficially pretend to consider as they sling their sound bites at us with images of George Bush and Tom Ridge. But there is a class of individuals who also rightly take on that role. Investigative writers and activists work hard to chase down all leads and to attempt to place meaning on the unfathomable. It is from within this world that 'conspiracy theory' is derived. Media has spent countless decades trying to tell you that conspiracy theorists are a bad thing. But this is exactly the role that any law enforcement officer or other investigator assumes when first reviewing a crime scene. They play the 'what if' game in their mind and see if the facts add up to support a plausible 'theory' of how the crime took place, who was involved, and their motives. From this develops an investigation. The only difference between cops and writers/activists is that one is sanctioned, and the other is not, and the differences in their resources and, sometimes, training or skills. Sometimes, the investigative writer even outclasses the cops in both areas. Remember Watergate to get a feeling for what I mean.
As a result, the writers and activists of this world face a tremendous uphill battle in trying to get at the truth, and trying to get the word out. Their goal is the same as that of the cop -- to build a case strong enough to force an official investigation and, if warranted, prosecution of those alleged guilty. Thus I suggest the reader bear in mind two key points just stated: one, that the evidence we writers or activists present is merely to allege the guilt of the parties involved; the other is to present our evidence to the public in hopes that it is strong enough to drive people to demand the evidence be officially reviewed and acted upon by those who would otherwise seem to ignore these facts -- for political reasons or, perhaps, bias based on or caused by false belief structures. (i.e. No government would never do anything this vile to its own people.) Thus our job is to provide what we might call 'smoking gun' quality in our evidence -- to stir the public to react in the strongest possible way, demanding justice be done with a proper and full independent investigation. But this demands we know what constitutes a smoking gun. In a court room scenario it is some incontrovertible bit of evidence which concretely ties the accused to the crime -- often literally a smoking gun with the killer's fingerprints on it. But for our purpose, outside of the courtroom, we need only provide an evidence suitable to demonstrate that wrongdoing was afoot, and that given accused individuals were somehow involved. It cannot merely be implied, though such 'coincidental' evidence is acceptable supporting evidence, or may be useful to illustrate motive or opportunity. No, a smoking gun must be more precise and inescapable with respect to conclusions. For example, that a given terrorist trained at a US military school may be seen as providing opportunity for culpability on the part of the military, it does not prove it. It is not a smoking gun. Neither is evidence of a deliberate cover up of such a fact. The military is perfectly capable of doing stupid things, to include improper acts under the guise of public relations, what is sometimes described as 'damage control.' On the other hand, if that same evidence included clues which demonstrate that the military knew their student was a terrorist at the time... that would be a smoking gun. Thus, for the purpose of the time line, where numerous smoking guns are offered, the reader should attempt to use these guidelines in determining the value of the evidence. However, sometimes the value or meaning of the clue with respect to meeting this criteria is veiled. Often, it is not a single bit of evidence but a collective, which makes clear the relevance. For instance, where we have a Terrorist going to a military school, later teaching at it, and eventually using materials from the school to separately teach the terrorists how to blow up skyscrapers... we don't quite have a smoking gun (just an incredibly stupid military). However, when we learn that this terrorist has all along been reporting to CIA and was protected by Army Intelligence when his own unit Commander suspected him of wrongdoing... that gives us a sum total picture which is entirely compelling and meets our requirements. Such evidence exists. Lots of it. Visit the time line and judge for yourself. Return to Top Return to Proparanoid.net Kissinger is Spelled W - A - R - R - E - N From two articles in issues of The ProParanoid
Newsletter,
with additional material
In this article, you will learn...
Well thank you, President Bush, for acknowledging that We, The People, have found so many things wrong with governmentís story about 911 that we need an independent investigation. Massive intelligence failure, or complicity in 911 by the military intelligence complex -- either way, we need and deserve to know the truth. The mere impression of improper financial relationships between you and virtually every key person in your Administration, or actual profiteering on mass murder -- we demand to know the truth. Thank you, again. But no thank you, Mr. President, for your intention to name Dr. Henry Kissinger to such a commission (since withdrawn.) This is clear evidence the independent investigation (was) intended by you and your friends in high places to squash the truth, and is yet one more clue that you yourself are as guilty as the ever growing string of facts imply. We do not need another rigged Warren Commission investigation. We do not need another Arlan Spectre ëmagic bulletí explanation like the one used to keep people from finding out about your father. We do not need Rockefellerís buddy to conduct another white wash investigation like the Rockefeller Commission on Assassinations which also shielded your father. If you donít know what I mean, I will explain, herein. We need the United States Government to conduct itself under the rule of law established by the US Constitution, and similarly, to govern We, The People, under that document and the Bill of Rights. Liars and thieves cannot do it. Nor can war criminals like Kissinger who stand accused by other nations of crimes against humanity involving mass murder, for what would be their motive for condemning others for what they themselves are accused of? Hogwash will not serve, and will not be tolerated. Nor will we allow you to continue to abrogate our rights in usurped powers under the guise of protecting us from terrorism. The public record now clearly shows us that the Warren Commission Report on the assassination of JFK was planned and created from the start to find for the ëlone gunmaní theory in hopes of avoiding a war with Russia. That presupposition was used as a weapon to frighten them into finding no reason to examine the facts, facts they were led into believing would point to Russian complicity, but which instead would point to the CIA and your father. The tactic was based on deliberate lies. That is fact, not supposition, and virtually every citizen of this country knows it, save Dan Rather and friends, who only know and believe official government statements, with no possibilities in-between, all else nicely categorized as conspiracy ëtheory.í Such as they will never be confused by facts, because their mind has been made up for them in Mockingbird fashion. The record clearly shows that that Russian fear was artificially instilled into the Warren Commission, and for the matter, into Lyndon Johnsonís thinking by CIA. This was the start of a marvelous set of very convenient (for your family) historical circumstances which we are supposed to believe were mere random and natural happenstance... Evidence clearly tells us that CIA was part and parcel of the assassination plot and the cover up. It clearly implicates your own father in that assassination, as well as Richard Helms,who worked at command levels with your father in Houston, Miami, and Langley -- if we are to believe Mark Lane and CIAís own firsthand witnesses, Marita Lorenz, and E. Howard Hunt. You can learn more about that, in case you donít have access to the closet with the family skeletons, at <http://www.proparanoid.net/jfk.htm> Good thing for the Agency that Lyndon was intimidated enough that he also assigned Helms to head CIA, making it easy for CIA to insure their role in the assassination would not come to light. How did they manage? Convenient happenstance, no doubt. How convenient for CIA and your father, for instance, that Gerald Ford was appointed to the Commission that he could feed secret Commission dialogs to the intelligence community -- that they could better frame evidence presented to the Commission towards finding the preferred lie and explaining it with a magic bullet. How marvelous that Operation Mockingbird had coincidentally placed Walter Cronkite (among others,) a former intelligence officer in Media service to insure we bought it hook, line, and sinker. Well, that was how it looked, anyway. No one really bought it except MIIMís media, but media itself never reported that, but instead insists (to this day) that only ëconspiracy theoristsí doubt it. If that be true, Mr. Bush, that also means that 280 million conspiracy theorists do not believe in Cronkite, or in you. Remember that when it comes time to be reelected. Shame on you for fooling me with chads, once, shame on me if you do it again. How appropriate that Jerry would be coincidentally rewarded for his part in that conspiracy to obstruct justice; CIA handing him the White House by politically assassinating both Vice President Spiro Agnew and his boss, Richard Nixon, with a little magic by the White House Plumbers -- that same Bay of Pigs Crowd that worked for your Dad and were sent to Dallas with guns and bullets for a President. Perhaps we should review the speculation on the identity of Deep Throat once more, because Iím starting to wonder if it wasnít your father. How very fitting, then, that Ford should coincidentally, in turn, pardon Nixon and prevent any subsequent investigation that might have revealed the truth behind Watergate, and CIAís true role in it -- perhaps to include your father. He also appointed Helms to direct CIA to help keep the secrets safe. But that was not his only work for CIA. Jerry next coincidentally sent Helms to Iran as Ambassador in time for staging of the fall of the Shah and the crisis that would evolve into Iran-Contra... while Jerry also coincidentally appointed your father to replace Helms as head of CIA. From there he could work with your familyís Arabic elite friends (the Mahfouz, bin Laden, and Faisals) to help establish the intricate money laundering conduits of BCCI, et. al, that have become so prominent in terrorism, today, and which was so key to Iran Contra. Letís not forget the S&L failure and its ties to these matters. Oh, the fortunes coincidentally made... Of course, your father would get the greatest reward of all for his part in these various crimes. First as head of CIA, then as Vice President, and then as President. From there, of course, your own luck took quite a turn for the better -- with the repeated help of the bin Laden, Mahfouz, and Faisals. Like father, like son? But first, there was the leadership stint at Eli Lilly at the time when the firm was developing psychotropic drugs which just happened to be a favorite commodity in every CIA mind control project from mass shooters to manchurian candidates to Delta warriors to mass suicide cults. But your dad knew nothing of that, did he? Of course, some of the key people at Lilly under your father have gone on to firms involved with your Arabic elite friends and tied to frozen bin Laden funds and terrorist money... where it suspiciously looks like a CIA proprietary (looks like, walks like, talks like) involved in the field of Anthrax either from the production side, the medical treatment side, or both. But I digress. I tend to do that when the trails of guilt lead off in so many directions. And when we come to you and your own history with the Arabic elites, we find the many ties to CIA and their efforts on behalf of your familyís oil industry friends to get a pipeline into Afghanistan. I am especially concerned at your stint as head of Caterair at a time when that firm employed one of the 911 hijackers, especially in light of the fact that both 911 airlines were served by the current Caterair entity, SkyChefs. Doubly so that there is no evidence that the 911 hijackers named by FBI were actually on the planes. Not even the passenger lists will be released by FBI because of problems in demonstrating that fact. No wonder we want to have an independent investigation. But we will not accept Kissinger as one to do it. He is a another Warren, only more so: |
|
Kissinger is most often called ëRockefellerís
protégé.í Indeed, the ties are deep, as deep as Rockefellerís
ties to the oil industry that is to benefit from 911 and the war in Iraq
(and future oilwars to come.) But there are other ties. Kissinger, like
Rockefeller and your family, is tied to the intelligence community time
and time again, having worked closely with just about all the power players,
most of whom are Skull and Bonesmen, like you and your father, and his
father before him. The family that spends time in a coffin, together, lies
together -- in all the meanings of the word.
The ties of S&B to Masonic, Satanic, and Fascist NWO thinking fit perfectly well with the fact that Kissinger, like most of the NWO elite crowd, is a card carrying members in the NWO round table groups (such as the Bilderbergers, Trilateralists, and the Council on Foreign Relations) and frequents the Bohemian Grove for wild Satanic rituals. These bulk of these men, and dare we presume it, you and your father, like most of his CIA predecessors, all believe in the same principles of eugenics, that mad belief that racial superiority espoused by Hitler is a valid concept, and as result, there are 3 billion too many people on this planet, and that they must somehow go. In so many matters representing political bumps in the night (national and international) Kissinger was always in the background, but never a background player. You name the crime or fiasco, and Kissinger was somewhere within it. See <http:// www.trialofhenrykissinger. org>) He started as a spy for the Soviets targeting US Military Intelligence (see Henry Kissinger, Soviet Agent, by Frank Capell) as reported by a top defecting Soviet officer who exposed several KGB spy operatives in exchange for protection. |
